Saintbertholdt

Joined

• started 24 topics
• posted 880 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Saintbertholdt

• 
  21

  Is Prince still a Jehovah Witness?

  by Greybeard in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  is prince still a jehovah witness?

  from the look of his new album, i think he has different ideas.

  it will be interesting to see how they deal with this.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Saintbertholdt

  Oooh he looks like he's doing a spaced out Jimmy Hendrix thing...

  Welcome back to reality Prince/Symbol/Whatever..,erm or should that be welcome back to psychedelic shroom land?

  
• 
  12

  Oh, and Freddie Franz says, "Thanks an effing bunch!"

  by rory-ks in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the faithful and discreet slave are free to look back now and make a mockery of whatever beliefs were previously held by jehovah's witnesses.. they are also free to make types and anti-types of some parts of scripture, and not of others.

  they do that thing where they focus on one part so as to distract from the fact that they are doing the exact same thing with another part.. for example, in his talk featuring the new understanding of the "man with the secretary's inkhorn," geoffrey jackson goes on to say:.

  we know in recent years we've been careful not to try and make types and anti-types of every aspect of what the bible says.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Saintbertholdt

  We know in recent years we've been careful not to try and make types and anti-types of every aspect of what the bible says...It doesn't matter! (uproarious laughter from audience)

  Would he, or any of the Governing Body, [have] stood up and said that directly to the face of Fred Franz back in the day?
  

  Definitely not. What I hate is that when Geoffrey Jackson is dead and gone the next generation of Governing Body members will say the exact same thing about the previous generations theological turds.

  There will be no accounting for the Governing Body's nonsense. Ever.

  Oh wait... the ordinary JW members will keep paying (some even with their lives) for their theological fertilizer.

  But just as Oubliette always writes: "Lets review, its a cult.", I also have my own motto/consolation:

  Today's Governing Body is ill equipped.
• 
  59

  Cooperate Members of the Watchtower Society

  by James Jack in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  a older sister in miami florida has told me that the special pioneer couple who got their walking papers last week said they are also voting members of the watchtower society.

  also his stock share is valued at $800,000!.

  i did some research and spoke to some longtime witnesses and found out that there are 500 voting members of the society and they are also called shareholders.. has anyone ever of someone selling his share?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Saintbertholdt

  Hi OrphanCrow,

  That is true - according to the 1945 amendment.
  However, if you check the most recent amendment (2003) that we have access to...

  As far as I can see the 2003 re-statement is for the WTBTS of New York and the 1945 amendment is for the WTBTS of Pennsylvania. These are separate corporations and the Pennsylvania corporation is the primary one which offered shares to the public and which were dissolved into voting shares for the 500 appointed voters.

  However I guess it would make sense for them to also have changed the Pennsylvania corporation in the same way (using bylaws for election), but unfortunately that document is not yet publicly available.

  The heart of your reasoning comes down to this:

  Let's imagine that some of those nonJWs are...let's see...bloodless surgeons....Would it be in the interest of people who work in bloodless medicine to have the WTS drop their blood doctrine? No, it wouldn't. But, keeping that doctrine in place would pay 'dividends' to the bloodless industry and anyone connected to it.

  Well the GB control the doctrine and so I read up on what the Watchtower says in this regard. Since 1971 the voting members no longer even re-elect the governing body at all (I did not know that). Since then (1971) the GB elect their own members by themselves:

  "In 1971 the same speaker explained that the members of the Watch Tower Society could not vote in the members of the anointed Governing Body. Why? “Because,” he said, “the governing body of the ‘slave’ class is not appointed by any man. It is appointed by . . . Jesus Christ, the Head of the true Christian congregation and the Lord and Master of the ‘faithful and discreet slave’ class.” Clearly, then, the members of the Governing Body cannot be voted into office by the membership of any legal corporation."

  http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2001051
  

  
  
  
• 
  59

  Cooperate Members of the Watchtower Society

  by James Jack in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  a older sister in miami florida has told me that the special pioneer couple who got their walking papers last week said they are also voting members of the watchtower society.

  also his stock share is valued at $800,000!.

  i did some research and spoke to some longtime witnesses and found out that there are 500 voting members of the society and they are also called shareholders.. has anyone ever of someone selling his share?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Saintbertholdt

  Let's imagine that some of those nonJWs are...let's see...bloodless surgeons. Or maybe administrators connected to blood management. How would their membership in the Society benefit them? Would the blood doctrine that the WTS has power over have any effect on their profession? Of course it would.

  Well if their were non-JW members voting it would mean the charter has been violated.

  This means that all the matters the members voted on may be null and void... even the re-election of the board.
• 
  59

  Cooperate Members of the Watchtower Society

  by James Jack in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  a older sister in miami florida has told me that the special pioneer couple who got their walking papers last week said they are also voting members of the watchtower society.

  also his stock share is valued at $800,000!.

  i did some research and spoke to some longtime witnesses and found out that there are 500 voting members of the society and they are also called shareholders.. has anyone ever of someone selling his share?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Saintbertholdt

  According to the 1945 charter amendment the Watchtower is a non-stock corporation with only voting shares.

  The voters are selected by the board and have to be dedicated male witnesses.

  If they elected non-JW's the Watchtower board would be violating the charter, and for this there can be serious consequences:

  First, there is a doctrine called ultra vires. It is a Latin term that essentially means that acts outside the permissible scope of authority set forth in the governing documents is unauthorized activity that cannot be ratified by the board. As an example, if a nonprofit enters into a contract that is outside the scope of its permissible activities, the contract could be voided. While there may be other arguments that could be raised to enforce an ultra vires contract, acting “ultra vires” puts the nonprofit at risk as well as those that are entering into transactions with it.

  Second, if directors act in ways that conflict with the nonprofit’s governing documents, they may be opening themselves up to an argument that they are breaching their fiduciary duties including the duty of due care and the duty of obedience. In most states, fulfilling one’s fiduciary duties is a prerequisite to a statute that basically says the board members can’t be held personally liable for their mistakes so long as the mistakes were made in good faith, out of loyalty and obedience to the corporation, and with due care. By failing to fulfill their fiduciary duties, the directors risk personal liability for any harm caused by their actions.
  

  Third, if the directors are ignoring the rights of the nonprofit corporation, most states have a process that permits a group of directors (or voting members in a membership corporation) to get together to bring a derivative suit on behalf of the corporation. In the nonprofit context, a derivative suit is a law suit brought by a group of directors or members against a third party. That third party can be another insider such as another director or group of directors. These suits are brought from time to time when relations break down and factions form on the board of a nonprofit.
  

  Fourth, the typical saviors for wayward nonprofit officers and directors, D&O insurance and corporate indemnification, won’t save directors who act outside the scope of their authority. D&O policies typically exclude ultra vires acts from coverage and corporate indemnification is generally not available to those acting outside the scope of their authority.

  from: http://charitylawyerblog.com/2010/07/14/nonprofit-law-jargon-buster-ultra-vires-acts/
  
• 
  3

  When we're all taking 'young blood' to ward off aging, THEN wt will reverse their murderous policy..

  by disposable hero of hypocrisy in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/04/can-we-reverse-ageing-process-young-blood-older-people?cmp=fb_.

  one of the first signs of aging, brain deterioration, seens to be reversed in mice (new synapses are created three fold) when they're given 'young blood', and vice versa.

  human trials are starting.......

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Saintbertholdt

  One of the first signs of aging, brain deterioration, seens to be reversed in mice (new synapses are created three fold) when they're given 'young blood', and vice versa. Human trials are starting......

  TV Movie plotline: Serial killings start happening in sleepy little town... the curious clues are that the victims are all young (both male and female), they share the same blood type and their bodies are drained of blood... the little village goes bananas... it must be a vampire!
• 
  38

  Had any weird dreams recently?

  by LoveUniHateExams in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so, i'll go first.. i dreamt last night that i was still at uni, i said goodbye to one of my lecturers.

  then ulrika jonsson (former weather girl, shooting stars captain, and swedish nymphomaniac) gave me a lift home in her car - wtf?!

  she kept trying to change the cd whilst trying to drive (reaching on the floor, looking for a cd).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Saintbertholdt

  Had any weird dreams recently?

  Well not recently, but I had a dream so strange that I wrote it down. Here goes:

  Starlight reflects from the surface of the lagoon. Eerie dark blue shades form under the shadowy water. I take slow measured breaths from the regulator and adjust my diving mask. From the deep a huge body appears, a biological submarine. The ancient predator faces me head on and stops two feet to my front. Its perfect gray skin reflects the fractured light of the heavenly luminaries. All is calm.

  I speak yet my lips do not form the words (but yet they are): "Won't you die if you don't move?".

  "It's your dream not mine", the megalodon replies deeply, serenely.
  

  "You have a message for me?"

  The waves ebb to and fro with the rhythms of the ocean.
  

  "We are sorry for feeding on your species from time to time. Most of us do not appreciate your taste"
  

  I digest this insight and reply: "Thank you for the apology. Will you stop doing it then?". I can hear the constant clicks of the coral on the ocean floor.
  

  "No. It is the way of nature".

  A minute passes in silence, or maybe an hour.

  "If we meet again would you spare me?" I ask hopefully and immediately I regret asking the question.

  "No" comes the reply in a thoughtful monotone.

  "I understand."
  

  Megalodon slowly starts to turn.

  "Do you have any... any advice for me?", I stutter.
  

  “Yes... when diving, do not relieve yourself in your wetsuit”.
  

  The gushes from its tail causes me to tumble over as sand particles cloud the water. As the murk clears I can see it has disappeared into the deep. The waves move me ever so slightly, to and fro, to and fro. I can hear the clicks of the coral on the ocean floor. In the distance a wave breaks.

  
  
  
• 
  104

  Farewell

  by EdenOne in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  "don't be dismayed by good-byes.

  a farewell is necessary before you can meet again.

  and meeting again, after moments or lifetimes, is certain for those who are friends.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Saintbertholdt

  I don't think a moderation team's purpose is to be "thought" nazis.

  It never starts out that way, but hey perhaps this time it will be different.
• 
  104

  Farewell

  by EdenOne in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  "don't be dismayed by good-byes.

  a farewell is necessary before you can meet again.

  and meeting again, after moments or lifetimes, is certain for those who are friends.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Saintbertholdt

  The moderation is for behaviour, not thought.

  The way we usually express thoughts are through talking, writing and actions. Of which talking and writing are the most direct way to express thoughts.

  That is why freedom of speech is so closely correlated with freedom of thought.
• 
  104

  Farewell

  by EdenOne in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  "don't be dismayed by good-byes.

  a farewell is necessary before you can meet again.

  and meeting again, after moments or lifetimes, is certain for those who are friends.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Saintbertholdt

  Err... group hug, anybody?

  Nice kitty... pat pat