Narkissos, Good way to celebrate your 1000th post. Yes, I agree with you that within the bounds of common presuppositions religion can be rational. Many of them are, which may be what attract us to the WT. They seemed to debunk the irrational beliefs of other 'religions' making a plausible effort to dispute their teachings with: 1 reason supported by 2 proofs. However, when the presuppositions are challenged we find the limits of rationality in religion. Religion has a different "way of knowing" from secularist. It's way of knowing is based on divine revelation which makes it inerrant and unchangeable. When new evidence is presented that seems to contradict the 'revelation' then the evidence must be set aside or explained away. After all, God cannot be found untrue. And before Little Toe picks up his marker again I will admit as he says:
not all religion is bible-based
I think that means some religion is willing to be flexible in their "way of knowing". That's cool. But not a popular thought in the US. Jst2laws