In a recent WT, the GB asked (I forget the exact wording), Is it possible that the "faithful slave" is simply a parable meant for all Christians, and not an identity as such?
Their answer, of course, backed by pretzel logic, is no.
I've noticed they've been doing this sort of thing more frequently. They'll ask a reasonable question about their doctrine that a reasonable person would ask, essentially acknowledging that your question is totally reasonable. Then they tell you that you're totally wrong, using little or no reason to counter your reasonable question. You're just wrong.
I've met with the same response when questioning the blood issue. Yes, how you feel is understandable. But, still, you're just plain wrong, and your viewpoint is prideful. No attempt to reason with me or even quote Scripture. Just wrong. Totally reasonable but totally wrong.