Posts by umbertoecho

190

Geoffrey Jackson - Royal Commission Live Hearing Now!

by LostinJapan in

.

https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.

umbertoecho

dubstepped, What scripture is that. Was it can't remember her name and I know who you are talking about. She held great authority..........Damn, what's her name. I'll send it straight off if I find out.

190

Geoffrey Jackson - Royal Commission Live Hearing Now!

by LostinJapan in

.

https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.

umbertoecho

I was worried at first, for I thought they were going to let him witness to them. Then I remembered how slowly they started the first time.

As Angus said......." Yes, well. We'll just go point by point for now..."

It put Mr Jackson back where he needed to be as he was so utterly smug at first.

190

Geoffrey Jackson - Royal Commission Live Hearing Now!

by LostinJapan in

.

https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.

umbertoecho

Go straight to the" Royal Commission for child sexual abuse case 29 type in live feed."

Just use those words and google or whatever will take you to the site.....make sure you see .gov.au.....

They have convened for lunch right now. Stewart set Jackson up so well just now. McClellan became impatient with Jackson for dodging the question.

33

Did you hear Stewart use the bible to prove an incredibly good point to Jackson!!

by umbertoecho in

i thought at the end, stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) how, in such a clever way stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed.

due to sufficient suspicion.. and therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse.

umbertoecho

I thought at the end, Stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) How, in such a clever way Stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed. Due to sufficient suspicion.

And therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse

100