Don't you think you have consistantly ignored CREATIONIST establishment tactics?
I mean, look at these threads;
... in them you or other Creationists or ID-ots show a remarkable ability to ignore evidence, misinterpret facts due to lack of knowledge or over-zealous belief (or be so poorly informed about the subject that the ear-tickling Creationist websites seem to be good sources of reliable information).
Time and time again, key flaws with Creationist or ID-ot (a new term I've coined) theory are not so much dealt with by the supposrteres of such theories as ignored. Or, even worse, they don't know enough about the subject to see the faults in the arguments they use (or copy and paste).
In the case given in this thread, the fact that the,er, 'gentleman' concerned completely violated professional ethics due to his beliefs, is essentailly not dealt with. In other instances you have gone back to websites which have shown themselves to be innacyrate or potentially deceptive, or to Creatuionist authoer who have likewise had their credibility destroyed.
It seems the substance of the Creationist's argument is not as important to you as the fact they are arguing against Evoluiton, but I have to say, with 'friends' like that, you certainly don't need any enemies.
Your desire to cram god into a conceptual box made by bronze-age goatherds seems to stem from a literalistic interpretation of the Bible that you are loathe to abandon, even though the literalistic interpretation is obviously incompatable with the evidence (such as the Flood's date is impossible given extant arcaelogical and living biological remains older than any of the the Flood's potential dates which could not be present if there was a literal Global Flood).
I have before asserted that this is probably due to the fact that literalism is probably key to other beliefs of yours, and accepting that the Bible is NOT the literal accurate word of god is so disasterous to your worldview that you will go to any lengths to avoid it.
Likewise I have asked why you have so little faith in god that you have to believe in a primative violent diety and a Creation myth one level of credulity up from god masturbating to create everything (such kyths do exist).
In view of this, you talking about 'Evolutionary establishment tactic' is a bit of a joke. It isn't even the pot calling the kettle black, as it's already been demonstarted that the kettle ISN'T black. It's more like 'the pot talking nonsense'.
I am very interested if you or any other beliverer in primative creation-myths (as theere are Hindu creationists and Muslim creationist who will say YOU are wrong as well) are capable of responding to this in substansive terms, instead of further unjustified complaints about how unfair it is (when at every opportunity over the past years you and the rest of the god-dishonouring literalists have only managed to show how fair criticisms of Creationists and their crack-pot theories is).
From past experienece you'll either absent yourself from the thread or fail to respond to the allegations regarding your behaviour.
Funny how someone claiming they have the truth needs to hide, quote erroneous twaddle, or remain silent....