scholar pretendus wrote:
: I seems to me that you simply follow the dumb theories of evolutionists who not only have a coherent singulatr theory of evolution
Really. What, exactly, is "a coherent singulatr theory of evolution"?
You're so incoherent that you don't realize that when you point a finger at others for incoherence, you've got three others pointing back at you. LOL!
: but as yet cannot create life, have not found a single missing link
Sure they have. Define "missing link" and I'll prove it.
: and account for the beginning of the cosmos.
Are you saying that they can or cannot account for it? Please try to maintain coherence through connectives.
: Celebrated WT scholars through the FDS of loyal, devoted and humble people have published the beautiful, scientific and simple Creator book.
This book appears to have been another creation of the late and lamented Harry Peloyan, for many years the editor-in-chief of Awake! and the author of the atrociously bad and dishonest 1985 Creation book. The Creator book is a lot better than the Creation book, but relies almost exclusively on the arguments (often unattributed or without proper source references) made by various so-called Intelligent Design proponents. Therefore, it makes the same mistakes as the latter do.
For an extensive debunking of the 1985 Creation book, see here: http://www.geocities.com/osarsif/ce01.htm
For a somewhat dated review of the 1998 Creator book, see here: http://www.geocities.com/osarsif/creator.htm
: This fine publication well documents current scientific theories which are now introducing a new paradigm of science, the ID movement which threatens to displace theistic and atheistic evolutionary pseudo science which is myhtology.
LOL! ID is in no sense science. It is religious dogma masquerading as science, as proved by the many statements made by ID proponents that their real purpose in promoting ID is to restore the traditional place of conservative religion in the U.S. ID has produced no usable results, and it never will, because it's merely a sophisticated argument from ignorance, and a retreat to the old "God of the gaps" religious philosophy.
: The evolutionists in Australia are frightened by the introduction into this country of the new DVD Unlocking The Mystery Of Life which has the scientic community tembling at the knees . . .
Just like I tremble at my knees at the superior scholastic skills of Celebrated Watchtower Scholars! LOL!
Actually, if the situation in Oz is similar to that in the U.S., the thing that most scientists are afraid of is the political clout of masses of ignorant voters who might easily be swayed by ID's religious dogma, and who might be able to severely damage science education and produce conditions that in the long run would surely ruin the U.S. as a scientific leader.
: The ID hypothesis acknowledges the simple scientific statements in Genesis that God made all things beautiful in his own way, manner, time and purpose.
See? Even you understand that ID is religion, not science.
: Evolution at its crudest is simply a mirror image of creation but in a demonic form because evolution is simply change and that is what the Genesis demonstates in the upward progression of life.
Really. But wait! Genesis has several important pieces of "creation" out of order. How do you account for that? And how long were the "creative days"? 7,000 years? A hundred million years? Were they of equal length? Let's see if you can support your answer with the Bible.
: The Creator is Jehovah revealed in the Creation of the World also revealed in His Word, the Bible.
Ok, assuming that's correct, how do you account for the existence of predators? Did Jehovah created the complex poison apparatus of snakes, spiders, scorpions and so forth, or did this evolve? How about the basic predatory instincts of these animals? Did Jehovah install these into the genetic makeup of his creatures after the Fall in Eden? Careful now, these are trick questions.
AlanF
