Thanks for reminding me!
She did actually ask the elders about 607 vs 586.
Last night she said she was surprised that not one of the elders, or elder's wives even knew there was an issue with 607. I pointed out that the last time they attempted to confront it head-on was in 1981 in the appendix of the "Kingdom Come" book. And I explained the reason why they did that back then. I pointed out that according to the reviews of Ray Franz's book on Amazon.com several brothers in the writing department (including him) had gone all over the world in their attempt to back up 607 BC. The found no support from any scholars, archeologists, or anything. So then everything apparetnly came to a head when he questioned why the Governing Body attempted to exert so much authority over people's lives when they could not even prove they had the authority.
It turns out some of the stuff in those folders were, (1) a scan of the Kingdom Come appendix with all my handwritten notes on it, (2) an actual Time Magazine article scan on Ray Franz and his exodus from the Society.
So I explained, coincidentally after that, they booted him and several members of the writing department, published all kinds of articles reminding the congregations of their authority, and changed the disfellowshipping policy from one where you COULD talk to them to one where you were NOT allowed to talk to them.
I told her that it was my opinion only, but it appears that the Society would prefer that people not dwell on their authority. They preferred to get rid of the people and bury the evidence. They have everything to lose if Jerusalem was destroyed in 586 and not 607.We talked a little on the subject of apostates. I admitted there are many wackjobs out there, but I believe there are others who simply would like to stop practicing the JW religion and would like to leave quietly. But the Society doesn't allow you to even do that without losing your family and friends.
-ithinkisee