The John Cedars Channel on YouTube taken down after posting a critique of leaked videos for Regional (District) Convention

by oppostate 42 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • The Fall Guy
    The Fall Guy

    Doesn't it reveal something sinister about YouTube - they are so quick to remove material which "infringes" a religious cult's copyright, but then drag their feet when dealing with content which evilly targets children. Not to mention terrorist propaganda videos.

  • AFRIKANMAN
    AFRIKANMAN

    A porn-star also gets a helluva lot of subscribers....

  • dubstepped
    dubstepped

    Pale Emperor - It seems someone at Watchtower's sole job is to type "Jehovah's Witnesses" into YouTube and report them.

    Yeah, his name is John Davis. Before him it was a guy named Richard Oliver. They come on here mad as can be about legal technicalities that they want to use to protect their cult but you'll rarely see them outraged about things like the abuse of children despite their ability to quote age of consent laws from countries around the world. It is fascinating to watch people react so vociferously to slights against laws but not against humans, even children. We always have at least one of them on here. So there will always be some monitoring other sites as well, like YouTube.

  • Onager
    Onager

    P.E. Did you put the whole video's up? Can't you cite Fair Use like the Cedars?

  • pale.emperor
    pale.emperor

    P.E. Did you put the whole video's up? Can't you cite Fair Use like the Cedars?

    The video quality of mine wasn't as good as the one Cedars put up a few months after me. I'll just leave Cedars to do his thing. No point having two up of the same vid. Plus mine didn't have me critiquing it, it was just the videos.

    Yeah, his name is John Davis. Before him it was a guy named Richard Oliver. They come on here mad as can be about legal technicalities that they want to use to protect their cult but you'll rarely see them outraged about things like the abuse of children despite their ability to quote age of consent laws from countries around the world. It is fascinating to watch people react so vociferously to slights against laws but not against humans, even children. We always have at least one of them on here. So there will always be some monitoring other sites as well, like YouTube.

    This doesn't sound like a cult at all does it ladies and gentlemen?

  • Diogenesister
    Diogenesister

    John may I ask what level of criticism would you find acceptable?

    They would be almost impossible to critique without some of the video being shown, surely you see that.

  • blownaway
    blownaway

    This tells me that these type of videos are having an affect on the cult

  • carla
    carla

    "Banned" videos tend to make more people want to watch them and see why they were taken down or what is on them that a company/religion don't want the public to see.

    quick Google search -here is an example of some banned Ted Talks that went viral because they were banned

    Some controversial banned TED talks that went viral

    (edited to remove videos)

    http://pinchofsocial.com/5-banned-ted-talks-list-talks-viral

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot
    dubstepped - "...They come on here mad as can be about legal technicalities that they want to use to protect their cult but you'll rarely see them outraged about things like the abuse of children despite their ability to quote age of consent laws from countries around the world. It is fascinating to watch people react so vociferously to slights against laws but not against humans, even children..."

    That still gobsmacks me.

    What kind of f**ktard tries to defend his authoritarian and legalistic regime to a community who've left said regime as a direct result of its authoritarianism and legalism and actually expect successful results?

    Are they actually stoopid enough to think they're gonna change any minds here?

    Or was that itself a stoopid question?



  • btlc
    btlc

    Fkin cultists always had an answer prepared. If you criticizing with bare hands, they say: lying apostates, where is the evidence? If you show part of material, they say: it is sliced out of context by mean apostates. If you show the whole show, they threat with charges because of copyright. The one and only true religion, yea right.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit