Thanks New Enlightened for the info.
And now I know what the double L stand for in LLOYD name , it's for LIAR .
On the other hand we all knew he was always full of 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩
by Simon 2831 Replies latest jw friends
Thanks New Enlightened for the info.
And now I know what the double L stand for in LLOYD name , it's for LIAR .
On the other hand we all knew he was always full of 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩
So let me get this straight, Mark O'Donnell knew about this rumour ,maybe from Barbara Anderson?
Yes!!
I have read her book also..
Im hearing more corroborating stories about this Ted Jaracz thing.
If this is true......
The problem for Lloyd being the one to break "secondhand" news is that he is also accused of being a pedophile by "secondhand" sources. If I'm the JWs and the press asks me about this I'd rightfully say that the person making the accusations has himself been accused of grooming and sexually abusing someone underage. Without any real evidence, this actually hurts the cause because of the source of information.
If he was thinking of someone other than himself and actually cared about the cause he would have channeled it through someone who had an untarnished record.
He can't have it both ways. He can't say when it comes to him all secondhand stories should not be believed because they are secondhand. But, when it comes to his secondhand information about someone else it should 100% believed.
Thank you was a new boy for this information .
SIMON:
So what's the update? Is the other 1000+ post dead? Are you going to move and tag this one on to that thread?
Just curious.
PS: Somehow, this is all Kim's fault. lol
😜 So I made a video , with a few clips from L.E JW Watch on Ted.Jaracz , where he contradict himself . Anyway , on one clip he say he didn't know ,(When he was in Australia , 2019) that there was concrete rumor about Jaracz being on the pedophile list... got those 2 comments on my tweet ...😁 Since Lloyd block me and I did the same , but I know he come to snoop .to see what where talking about ...I thought maybe he would like to see this ..
re: Jaracz - AFAICT there is no evidence, no one has any evidence, there is only hearsay and we know how easy that is. No difference to inventing claims about the other guy buying some bottles of liquor - even though there was evidence he was buying it, any claims about why are a complete invention so as to be worthless. But if you're a certain YouTuber, you don't care about facts, you just care about clicks and making claims that you have some inside knowledge when in reality you have bugger all.
So what's the update? Is the other 1000+ post dead? Are you going to move and tag this one on to that thread?
Yeah, I need to get some time to write the code to do it, but haven't gotten to it so far. I don't see there's any rush.
My excuse for everything from now on will be to just say "because Kim, that's why!"
My excuse for everything from now on will be to just say "because Kim, that's why!"
LOL! Mine too
It's ALL Kim's fault.
OUCH