So if the courts have decided abortion is OK, you agree?
No, I only agree that the court has the power to make the determination I don't agree with the decision, any more then I agreed with the decision to incarcerate all the Japanese Americans in the 40s.
And you define human life as anything having human DNA? Does a skin sample being kept alive in a petri dish after its host human is dead qualify? Is not, why not?
no skin sample in a dish would not qualify as human death any more then the skin you loose with a sun burn would, or even if a lost an arm or leg. but let us not say that skin in a dish can not die or is not alive. to kill part of a person is not considered killing under the law unless it leads to the breakdown of the bodies ability to feed it's curent cells and reproduce new living cells, which would not happen in the case you mentioned. I'm not saying that extraordinary measures need to be taken to protect all living human cells, only ordinary measures need to be taken to protect the human as a whole so he can keep producing cells.
If one lives he/she has not been killed, some times aborted babies live, let us not tell them it wasn't you that we tried to abort only a fetus. You magically appeared in the body later. sorry for all the damage kid. I just can't see it like that.
At the risk of being redundant here it is.
Things you can use DNA tests to find the truth about.
If there is a leg on the ground and you clam it is your leg and DNA tests show it is not your leg, I don't care what you say your lying the same holds true with any thing you clam as part of you.
DNA tests show a feuds is not a mutation of the mothers cells, like a cancer, but is a separate life form.
DNA tests can be used to determine the species of the sample. If the sample tested is human DNA, it cannot be something other then a human.
feuds questions answered by DNA tests:
is the feuds alive, yes
is it the mother, no
is it human, yes