Millions die in Natural disasters - God is doing nothing. Do I adopt Anthropomorphism to him?

by KateWild 199 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • bohm
    bohm

    nohah: Are you referring to the standard model when you say "strongly held theory"?

    The Higgs bosone is a prediction of the standard model. The standard model explain a number of quantum phenomena with an extremely high degree of precision. The reason the standard model is "strongly held" was because it had been confirmed again and again experimentally. The Higgs bosone is just another example of how the standard model is experimentally confirmed.

    Can you give us some example of similar predictions/experimental confirmations of other faith-based ideas such as christianity?

  • bohm
    bohm

    jonah: "It became evidence when it became evident"

    what is this even supposed to mean?

  • jonahstourguide
    jonahstourguide

    How many reams of mathematical calculations are in the trash can ????

    Every formulator of those had the same strongly held theory.

    Like wise those who try to prove or hold on to these theories regarding god

    continue to fill trash cans with theories ad nauseum.

    As with any theories or mathematical calculations we wait for the final proof.

    Dna computing was gonna be hot too but I haven't heard how that's going so far.

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    Strongly held theory means a large body of evidence....

    Jonah, do you think they built the LHC at CERN with their fingers crossed! Lol

    They knew to look for it , but it took nearly 20 years to know WHERE to look for it. The bosonwas elusive due to where it lived. jonah, how do you think science is done? You need evidence before you get a penny of research grant, then the finances increase as the body of evidence increases.

    There are 5 steps to doing science, the latter being prediction. So in all science, for something to be evident you have to mske predictions and do experiments, but that is after a long haul of hard work. That is the work we saw at CERN.

    maybe check out other ways it was predicted before being evident...

    Higgs Boson Mass predicted by the Four Color Theorem

    Ashay Dharwadker * and Vladimir Khachatryan †

    We show that the mathematical proof of the Four Color Theorem yields a perfect interpretation of the Standard Model of particle physics. The steps of the proof enable us to construct the t -Riemann surface and particle frame which forms the gauge. We specify well-defined rules to match the Standard Model in a one-to-one correspondence with the topological and algebraic structure of the particle frame. This correspondence is exact - it only allows the particles and force fields to have the observable properties of the Standard Model, giving us a Grand Unified Theory . In this paper, we concentrate on explicitly specifying the quarks, gauge vector bosons, the Standard Model scalar Higgs H 0 boson and the weak force field. Using all the specifications of our mathematical model, we show how to calculate the values of the Weinberg and Cabibbo angles on the particle frame. Finally, we present our prediction of the Higgs H 0 boson mass M H 0 = 125.992 ~ 126 GeV , as a direct consequence of the proof of the four color theorem.

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    DNA computing is changing the world ha ha ha ha... But if you havent kept up to date, who is to blame?

    FACEPALM

  • bohm
    bohm

    jonah:

    How many reams of mathematical calculations are in the trash can ????

    Every formulator of those had the same strongly held theory.

    the same strongly held theory? you are not making any sence.

    It is quite clear you are just trying to pretend you have an idea what you are talking about but you know nothing about the relevant physics or how science works. yawn.

  • jonahstourguide
    jonahstourguide

    Which experiment confirmed the standard model again and again?

    And why didn't the scientific fraternity credit him earlier for his hard work?

    I've obviously missed something. By the way I'm no scientist but

    am fascinated by the studies therein.

  • jonahstourguide
    jonahstourguide

    Thank you snare, I'm going to have a good look.

    Have they found a way of making dna computing more commercially viable?

  • bohm
    bohm

    jonah:

    Which experiment confirmed the standard model again and again?

    These are many but you could begin by reading on the discovery of the top quarks (and various properties of other quarks), the discovery of the tau neutrino and for more recent evidence the higgs boson or the accurate prediction of the B_s meson in to muons. Seriously, this is like asking what evidence there is in support of electromagnetism or newtonian mechanics; if you are completely unfamiliar with theoretical physics, you could at least try to google before making grand claims on the quality of the evidence.

    And why didn't the scientific fraternity credit him earlier for his hard work?

    What makes you think they did not? Seriously dude..

    Peter Higgs has a big name in theoretical physics; now it turned out his most important contribution was also true (the higgs bosone exist) and this has made his name resurface in the popular press. This is a huge leep forward for theoretical physics because it put the standard model on even firmer ground.

  • konceptual99
    konceptual99

    Jonah, when considering a "strongly held theory" that has been put in the rubbish bin please ensure that you are not actually referring to a hypothesis that has been falsified after experimentation.

    In general a true scientific theory is rarely completely falsified since it is based on observed experimentation. It may evolve or be modified on the basis on new knowledge developed after futher experimentation and observation but that's not the same as throwing it in the bin.

    Compare the development of scientific "new light" to the process of flip flops and contradictions that mark WTS theological "new light".

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit