I don't care what anyone says, homosexuality is an unnatural thing and a certain degree of so-called 'homophobia' (gay agenda propaganda term, not a proper scientific or medical term) is totally natural.
I've got a few questions for you Yadda, about this comment of yours.?
You say, " homosexuality is an unnatural thing." The Oxford online dictionary defines 'natural' as:
"existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind"
How do we know whether something exists in nature? Would you agree that it is by observation?
If you do agree, then can we observe 'homosexuality' in' nature'?
I quoted (on the other concurrent gay thread) Bruce Bagemihl's book, 'Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Adversity.' Bagemihl's book is a metastudy of hundreds of observations by biologists and naturalist of animal sexual behaviour (in nature, do you agree?) that demonstrate that homosexuality exists naturally in other life forms, besides humans
So your claim that homosexuality is 'unnatural,' is false and misleading.
Now, let's look at your other claim in your statement.
and a certain degree of so-called 'homophobia' (gay agenda propaganda term, not a proper scientific or medical term) is totally natural.
The first point I'd like to discuss is your claim that the term 'homophobia' is not a proper scientific or medical term.
If you are right, then we should not find it being used in professional journals. Right?
So let's look: Here's a quote from The American Psychological Associations, Newsletter
WASHINGTON -- Psychoanalytic theory holds that homophobia -- the fear, anxiety, anger, discomfort and aversion that some ostensibly heterosexual people hold for gay individuals -- is the result of repressed homosexual urges that the person is either unaware of or denies. A study appearing in the August 1996 issue of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association (APA), provides new empirical evidence that is consistent with that theory.
If you are right and, "the term 'homophobia' is not a proper scientific or medical term," why is it being used by an organisation like the APA?
Please note that:
The American Psychological Association (APA), in Washington,DC, is the largest scientific and professional organization representing psychology in the United States and is the world's largest association of psychologists. APA's membership includes more than 142,000 researchers, educators, clinicians, consultants and students. Through its divisions in 49 subfields of psychology and affiliations with 58 state and Canadian provincial associations, APA works to advance psychology as a science, as a profession and as a means of promoting human welfare.
Are you still agreeing, or are you disagreeing?
Finally, here's the full details of the study under discussion:
Article: 'Is Homophobia Associated With Homosexual Arousal?' by Henry E. Adams, Ph.D., Lester W. Wright, Jr., Ph.D. and Bethany A. Lohr, University of Georgia, in Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp 440-445.
The matter being checked was is there a connection between homophobia and homosexual arousal. That is, if someone with an anxiety problem over their personal homosexual attractions, sees male to male sexual activity, does it cause even deeper anxiety that becomes manifest as homophobia?
May I ask you a question now? Why does it matter to you, what someone else does in bed (or, elsewhere) ?