So what blog did you get that cut and paste from?
CREDIBLE SOURCE, PLEASE.
** oh, I'm so stupid for being critical of some person I've never met on the internet, so utterly STUPID! **
Chemtrails, Seeing is believing.
by pedal power 482 Replies latest social current
-
-
ProdigalSon
http://www.carnicom.com/micro3.htm
SUB-MICRON PARTICULATES ISOLATEDClifford E Carnicom
Santa Fe, New Mexico
Apr 26 2004A method has been developed to isolate and record the existence of certain sub-micron particulates that appear to be resident within the atmosphere. The evidence from this research continues to support the claim of high levels of extremely fine metallic salts within the atmosphere as a consequence of the aerosol operations. The method developed incorporates a combination of ionization collection, electrolysis for separation, and significant advances in microscopy that have been made with relatively modest means. A signficant chemical reaction demonstrating the presence of metallic ions from the atmospheric sample is presented.
The presence of the fibrous and powder/crystal photographed below was called to my attention in early January by a resident of Santa Fe, New Mexico. The filtration system within the house uses three Ionic Breeze Electrostatic Air Cleaners (Model number 51637) manufactured by Sharper Image. This resident pays careful attention to the state of cleanliness of the house and filter system, and an unusual coating was observed to exist on a plate ionizing air filter after an absence of several days. After cleaning, an identical condition occurred again after a second absence. Acting upon a request, I therefore made a direct visit to the residence to view the sample. The light coating was not obvious to a casual observer, but was discernible and beige in color.
Over a period of a couple of weeks, samples of the material were accumulated and have been placed under the microscope. The results of that session at magnification levels of 60x and 200x follow. The material is unusual in that it is fairly uniform in composition, and consists of two primary materials: powder/crystals and fibers. The fibers are translucent to white, and are suprisingly uniform in their general nature. They do not appear to resemble textile or animal fibers in any way because of the uniform nature, size and color. There is no known source within the residence to explain the origin of these two materials. Close observation of the filtration system by the resident is a likely factor in the discovery of this material.
Magnification 200x
Fibers and Crystal-Powder Form Collected from Ionizing Air FilterMagnification 60x
Fibers and Crystal-Powder Form Collected from Ionizing Air FilterThe material has now been placed into solution and subjected to electrolysis. A significant chemical reaction does occur. It is apparent from the level of electrolytic reaction that occurs that a metallic salt is a dominant component of the material. A highly insoluble precipitate forms as a result of this reaction; a record of this event is also shown below. The copper electrodes do not appear to be highly significant in the reaction, but they do appear to be a factor in the final bluish tint to the precipitate that forms. The insolubility of the precipitate is a dominant factor in the identification process. Subsequent observations will more carefully analyze the effect of the electrolysis upon the fibrous materials.
Readers are referred to an earlier paper 1 of May 27 2002 entitled "Electrolysis and Barium" as a precedent to the current research. It will be recalled within that paper that an outdoor filtration system was used to collect the solid materials over a six week period, and the solids subsequently placed into solution. The current method of ionization appears to be a more direct and rapid method of accumulating the solid material forms, as the final results are identical in both cases. Advances in microscopy also provide a significant and new benefit. Two years have elapsed since the earlier progress, and this delay continues to point out the need for additional resources, expertise and activism to progress with disclosure on the aerosol issue.
Approximately 45 minutes into the electrolysis process.
Fibers have risen to top of distilled water.Approximately 24 hours into the electrolysis process.
Significant precipitate formation at bottom of container.
Fibers have been removed.
Gas forms at cathode.Solubility tests have also been conducted on the precipitate that forms from the electrolysis reaction. The results of this testing, including the use of distilled water, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid and ethanol again point to the likelihood of an identical precipitate 2 being formed in this case. The precipitate is highly insoluble in water, insoluble in weak hydrochloric acid, insoluble in ethanol and slightly soluble in weak sulphuric acid. The best analysis that exists at this time continues to point to the formation of a barium sulphate compound. It is not to be concluded that barium sulphate is an original atmospheric compound; the compound forms as a result of electrolysis. A reasonable supposition that can be made with current and former information available is that high levels of a barium or metallic compound exist within the atmosphere, and that this compound leads to ion formation within solution or water. In addition, testing with sodium hydroxide leads to a white precipitate being formed (close examination required); this along with the electrolysis does indicate the presence of a metallic cation within the solution, regardless of any final identification that is to be made 3 .
In summary, the current research involves a process of collection of atmospheric samples with the use of a plate ionizing filter. This material is unusual in nature and is composed of two primary forms : fairly uniform fibrous and crystalline/powder material. This material has been collected, placed into solution and subjected to electrolysis. A definite and repeatable chemical reaction does take place, which results in the formation of a highly insoluble precipitate. The best current analysis of that material positively identifies the existence of a metallic salt. The best analysis of the nature of that metallic salt is that of a barium compound which releases positive metallic ions in solution.
In addition, direct visible observation of the precipitate under extremely high magnification detects the presence of reasonably uniform spherical sub-micron particulates within the electrolysis result. The specific gravity of these particulates is greater than that of water. The microscope technique developed combines an analog oil immersion microscope rated at 1000x with a digital camera addition that was originally applied to astrophotography. This microscope now provides views which can be recorded at 1000x, 4000x and 10,000x; these levels far exceed conventional visible light microscopy limits of 1000x to 2000x, and materials at the 2 micron size range. It has long been postulated that the size of the aerosols under examination is in the sub-micron range, and that extremely high magnification will be necessary for detection. The size range of the aerosols has previously been estimated at approximately 0.5 microns in size as a result of atmospheric light effects; this conforms to the current observations.
Magnification ~20,000x
Oil Immersion Microphotograph of Precipitate Components
Estimated size of particulates is 0.7 microns(Original ~ 10000x with 2x enlargement)Magnification ~20,000x
Oil Immersion Microphotograph of Precipitate Components
Estimated size of particulates is 0.7 microns(Original ~ 10000x with 2x enlargement)Magnification ~20,000x
Oil Immersion Microphotograph of Precipitate Components
Estimated size of particulates is 0.7 microns(Original ~ 10000x with 2x enlargement)It is now hoped that citizens will begin duplicating this sampling process and obtain a positive identification of the materials that have been isolated. A justifiable case for analysis and identification of the metallic based materials by private professionals and by public and government environmental and health agencies is well established, and citizens are asked to pursue that goal in earnest.
References:
1. Clifford E Carnicom, Electrolysis and Barium, (http://www.carnicom.com/precip1.htm), May 27, 2002
2. Carnicom, May 27, 2002.
3. Lawrie Ryan, Absorb Chemistry for GCSE by Lawrie Ryan, Testing for Ions, (http://www.crocodile-clips.com/absorb/AC4/sample/LR). -
shamus100
P.S. Your previous cut and paste was just completely debunked.
Now we're onto this one - still no proof, but I await a credible scientist, not some wacked out dweeb who did too much acid in the 60's. Yes, there are plenty of those scientists around, LOL.
-
ProdigalSon
http://www.carnicom.com/predict1.htm
PREDICTING THE OPERATIONS:
SUNSPOTS AND HUMIDITYSep 3 2002
Edited Oct 08 2002
Edited Nov 08 2002
Edited Oct 29 2003
(Recommend printing in landscape mode)
Clifford E CarnicomSANTA FE REPORT : INDEX ON 112702 AT 0900 IS 44Model correlation is statistically significant at 98% level as of 11/08/02
Additional Notes Oct 29 2003:
Please note that this article was authored on Sep 3 2002. The additional factor of vertical column aerosol density, most easily measured by star magnitude visibility, appears also to be significant in the prediction of the onset of the aerosol operations in a particular region.
Research over an extended period of time indicates that there is likely a strong relationship between the appearance of the aerosol operations in a given locale and time and the interaction of the following primary variables: sunspot activity, relative humidity, change in relative humidity and the relative cloud cover. The inclusion of the solar activity within this current examination may be a significant avenue of research that establishes a series of ties with earlier discussions related to ionospheric, electromagnetic and defense projects, applications of HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) and plasma physics that also appear on this site. Current studies on planetary physics and celestial considerations may demonstrate further relationships to the aerosol operations in the future.
This current work expands upon earlier presentations that have been made in the spring of 2001 related primarily to the relative humidity issue. These papers are available at The Aerosol Reports : United States; A Model Under Development and The Aerosol Report. This earlier work focused upon the consideration of relative humidity values across the nation in conjunction with observed aerosol operations. The result of that earlier work indicated a close link between increased relative humidity levels that were scaled according to local conditions and the likelihood of concurrent aerosol operations. Other researchers and considerable anectodal information have also added to that body of correlations that now exist.
Since that time, increased attention has been given to the drought crisis that has emerged over the last three to four years, and further links from a scientific standpoint have been made to the aerosol operations with these events. Readers may wish to refer to the following paper Drought Inducement as well as an audio interview with Mr. Jeff Rense (June 4, 2002) on this same topic. Readers may also wish to become familiar with the the refuting arguments that I have made against any so-called "global warming mitigation" aerosol theories (e.g., Edward Teller) that have been proffered by certain well-publicized journalists and broadcasters. Analysis indicates that the introduced aerosols will aggravate the so-called "global warming" problem rather than lessen it. My concerns on the drought issue and the potential crisis that is likely to affect food production and water availability now and in the future have only been amplified since those presentations were made. It appears to me that it will be difficult, if not impossible, for the drought to subside and crops to improve as long as the aerosol operations continue unchecked without public outcry and action.
Local atmospheric electricity and magnetometer observations have also been added to the data set as of Sep 21 2002 and Oct 07 2002 respectively. These observations are a part of current research that expands upon that presented within this page, and they will be explained further at a later time.This paper will again be divided into two sections. The latter half will outline the more technical aspects of the study, whereas the general findings are presented above.
Further Discussion:
An empirical model has now been developed of the following form:
I = c * [(log(SS+1) / 2.5) 4 * (log(RH mean +1) / 2) 2 * ((deltaRH + deltaRH max ) / (2 * deltaRH max )) * cos(%CC * (pi / 200))] + 10
whereSS = daily sunspot number
RH mean = average of relative humidity in per cent at ground location(RH gnd ) for the site of interest and the relative humidity in percent at commercial flight elevation(RH el ) (250mb).
deltaRH = the change in average relative humidity in per cent from the previous day for the site of interest
deltaRH max = the absolute value of the maximum change in average relative humidity in per cent from the previous day for the site of interest over the time interval that the model is to be used.
c = a constant, defined as 80 /I' max
where I' max = the maximum value of the product : (log(SS+1) / 2.5) 4 * (log(RH mean + 1) / 2) 2 * ((deltaRH + deltaRH max ) / (2 * deltaRH max ))* cos(%CC * (pi / 200))
reached during the time interval that the model is to be used.
CC = cloud cover index estimated according to the following table:
Condition
CC Index
Evaluation of CC Term
Clear
0
1
Mostly Clear
25
0.92
Partly Cloudy
50
0.71
Mostly Cloudy
75
0.38
Rain or Complete Cloud Cover
100
0.0
I represents an index value, scaled between 0 and 100 (for usual circumstances), that indicates the suitability of conditions for (and increased likelihood for) the aerosol operations to be conducted. Lower values indicate less favorable circumstances for the aerosol operations to occur, and higher values more favorable cirumstances for the aerosol operations to occur.
The following is the specific model being used for the Santa Fe NM region at this time:
I = 175 * [(log(SS+1) / 2.5) 4 * (log(RH mean + 1) / 2) 2 * ((deltaRH + 35) / 70) * cos(%CC * (pi / 200))] + 10This specific model as well as the original form will be modified or revised freely as circumstances require, and it is to be considered as preliminary. In particular, the deltaRH max term is likely to increase as a longer time interval is used for the model. .To illustrate the use of this model, a table of data will be presented for the Santa Fe area, along with the results of the model as compared to observation reports for the same time period.
Date
Time
SS
RH gnd
RH el
RH mean
dRH
Natural
Cloud Cover
EstimateCC Index
I'
I
Comments/Observations
Local
Atmospheric Electricity Measurements
Time - Obs.
uALocal
Magnetometer
Measurements
Horiz. Component
Time - Obs
delUnit = 0.486 o deflectiondelM
0727
1000
323
58
NA
58
11
Clear
0
0.52
101
Blitz. Extraordinary activity reported in TX, NM, CO.. Normal range of model exceeded.
0821
2200
209
26
31
28
NA
Clear
0
NA
NA
NA.. Start of modeling; eliminate from scoring of model.
0822
0900
238
16
21
18
-10
Clear
0
0.12
31
Light ops
0823
0900
205
38
40
39
21
Clear
0
0.37
75
Heavy ops
0824
0800
207
43
57
50
11
Clear
0
0.36
72
Heavy ops
0825
0830
199
23
15
19
-31
Clear
0
0.02
14
No ops directly observed; unusual transformations of aerosol "clouds" in PM; observations insufficient and indeterminate; eliminate from scoring of model.
0826
0900
136
16
57
36
17
Clear
0
0.24
52
No ops, Jemez Mtn. fire in PM
0827
0900
105
14
17
15
-21
Clear
0
0.03
15
No ops
0827
2400
133
46
NA
46
31
Mostly
Clear25
0.29
61
Moist air arrival in PM; heavy ops in PM
0828
0900
133
63
36
49
3
Partly
Cloudy50
0.14
34
Light to med ops
0829
0900
87
93
40
66
17
Partly
Cloudy50
0.16
38
Much moisture in sky; light to med ops
0830
0900
146
72
19
45
-21
Clear
0
0.08
24
Light ops to none
0831
0900
150
43
45
44
-1
Clear
0
0.19
43
None in Santa Fe(SF) region w/ clear skies; Heavy local ops on east horizon approx 200 miles easterly; aerosol cloud bank on east horizon
0901
0900
153
51
32
41
-3
Partly Cloudy
50
0.12
31
Light to Med ops east of SF in AM; none in PM. Increasing cumulus clouds. Humidity decreases in PM.
0902
0900
187
52
28
40
-1
Mostly
Cloudy75
0.08
24
Mostly cloudy skies; No ops visible within clear patches.
0903
0900
227
68
32
50
10
Mostly
Cloudy75
0.14
34
Mostly Cloudy skies. No ops visible within clear patches.
0904
1000
266
49
17
33
-17
Clear
0
0.14
34
No ops
0905
1000
215
34
21
27
-6
Clear
0
0.16
38
No ops
0906
0800
225
46
59
52
25
Clear
0
0.51
99
Very heavy ops in western sky and ABQ; progressive activities and dispersals over Santa Fe; numerous reports of heavy ops at several locations in U.S.A.
0907
0900
189
44
33
38
-14
Partly
Cloudy50
0.09
26
Light to no ops. Increasing cloudiness
throughout day. Another storm system
destroyed.0908
0900
180
54
29
42
4
Mostly
Clear25
0.23
50
No ops
0909
0830
221
75
51
63
21
Mostly
Cloudy75
0.19
44
Light to no ops visible w/in clear patches of sky. Increasing cloudiness through day.
0910
0900
194
88
33
60
-3
Rain
100
0.00
10
Rain. No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring.
0911
0900
226
98
36
67
7
Rain
100
0.00
10
Rain. No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring.
0912
0800
213
90
38
64
-3
Mostly
Cloudy75
0.11
29
No ops within clear patches.
0913
0830
258
89
24
45
-19
Clear
0
0.27
57
No ops
0914
0900
246
72
23
47
2
Partly
Cloudy50
0.22
49
No ops. Reports of heavy activities in eastern US.
0915
0900
256
71
22
46
-1
Clear
0
0.30
62
No ops
0916
0800
168
86
13
50
4
Clear
0
0.25
54
No ops
0917
0900
190
67
27
47
-3
Clear
0
0.22
48
No ops
0918
0900
228
53
38
46
-1
Partly
Cloudy25
0.25
53
No ops. Increasing cloudiness throughout day and heavy rain in PM.
0919
0900
225
76
2
39
-7
Partly Cloudy
50
0.14
35
Cloudy in AM. Partly cloudy later AM and PM. Light ops in northern horizon at sunset.
0920
0800
206
74
18
46
7
Clear
0
0.31
64
No ops.
0921
0900
237
66
14
40
-6
Clear
0
0.22
49
No ops
2300 .480
0922
0800
217
59
16
37
-3
Mostly
Clear25
0.21
46
No ops. Measurements 1500-1800 taken at Jack's Creek, Elev 9500'
0030 .476
0900 .477
0915 .475
1500 .478
1615 .499
1630 .501
1800 .491
2100 .4880923
0800
218
66
18
42
5
Clear
0
0.29
61
No ops
0030 .473
0900 .479
1300 .477
2315 .4710924
0900
209
57
31
44
2
Mostly
Clear25
0.25
53
No ops. Cumulus clouds diffused by aerosols.
1000 .479
1300 .4760925
0800
240
59
25
42
-2
Mostly
Clear25
0.24
52
No ops. Cumulus clouds diffused by aerosols.
0015 .474
0100 .472
0130 .474
0900 .475
1545 .502
1815 .4770926
0800
230
49
31
40
-2
Partly
Cloudy50
0.17
40
No ops. Repeated diffusion of clouds by aerosol base.
0900 .474
0927
0800
157
56
25
40
0
Clear
0
0.20
44
No ops.
0900 .475
1500 .467
1530 .465
1530 .466
2000 .4750928
0800
185
93
19
56
16
Rain
100
0.00
10
Rain. No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring.
0030 .476
0900 .4760929
0900
140
71
19
45
-11
Mostly
Cloudy75
0.05
19
No ops.
0830 .481
0830 .493
0915 .473
0930 .4750930
0900
146
62
35
49
4
Clear
0
0.22
49
No ops. Note solar storm index @100+.
0930 .486
0930 .494
1115 .488
1115 .477
1115 .473
1240 .495
1645 .480
1645 .4831001
0800
94
77
19
48
-1
Partly
Cloudy50
0.10
27
No ops. Note solar storm index @100+.
0015 .480
0015 .474
1300 .478
1300 .482
1300 .483
1300 .493
1800 .509
1800 .5041002
0800
105
66
22
44
-4
Clear
0
0.13
33
No ops. Solar wind storm ceases.
1015 .494
1015 .485
1015 .4771003
0800
99
65
20
43
-1
Clear
0
0.13
33
No ops. Solar storm increases again.
0915 .475
0915 .473
0915 .483
1215 .493
1215 .509
1445 .466
1445 .466
1445 .4601004
0830
81
46
16
31
-12
Clear
0
0.06
21
No ops.
1000 .475
1000 .4761005
0900
98
32
30
31
0
Clear
0
0.11
30
No local observations available. Exclude from scoring. Exteme sinus allergic response in AM after overnight outdoor exposure in San Luus Valley CO. Visibility degradation from aerosols apparent.
1030 .452
1006
0900
155
35
56
45
15
Clear
0
0.30
62
No local observations available. Exclude from scoring. Reports of heavy ops in Phoenix and Tuscon and SW NM on CTTUSA after hiatus. Msmts. taken at Salida CO, Elev 7000'.
1000 .460
1000 .460
1215 .499
1215 .483
1215 .4771007
0900
126
63
18
40
-5
Partly Cloudy
50
0.10
28
No ops. Increasing cloudiness. Heavy aerosol cloud bank to S. and SW.
Solar storm index @84.0930 .460
0930 .458
0930 .459
1245 .463
1245 .458
1500 .459
1500 .453
1500 .457
1915 .466
1915 .468
1915 .460
2000 .4832400 398
1008
0830
143
63
61
62
22
Mostly Clear
25
0.34
69
Light to med ops. Heavy aerosol cloud bank over ABQ; in process of extending to Santa Fe. Wind increases. Dissipation of aerosol bank by 1415. Observations @1530 in Espanola NM under clear skies.
1000 .475
1000 .473
1000 .472
1100 .475
1100 .475
1100 .479
1315 .473
1315 .473
1315 .473
1400 .475
1400 .473
1400 .4731530 .483
1530 .506
1945 .505
1945 .4810100 405.00
0215 405.25
0830 405.25
0900 406.00
1100 405.50
1200 404.00
1300 403.00
1900 402.007.0
0.2
0.0
1.5
-0.2
-1.5
-1.0
-0.2
RMS=2.6
n=81009
0800
128
64
23
44
-18
Clear
0
0.08
24
No ops Local hospital employee report of increased respiratory and sinus illness amongst employees.
0830 .474
0830 .476
0830 .475
1330 .472
1330 .478
1330 .4740800 401.50
0815 402.00
0845 402.25
0930 402.25
2100 397.500.0
2.0
0.3
0.0
-.4
RMS=0.9
n=51010
0900
226
33
26
29
-15
Clear
0
0.13
32
No ops. Increased reports of heavy ops across other portions of country at CTTUSA. Rapid respiratory illness onset approx 1600.
0930 .473
0930 .475
1015 .479
1015 .489
1015 .474
1350 .495
1350 .502
1350 .469
2115 .474
2115 .472
2115 .4780900 401.75
2030 401.750.4
0.0
RMS=0.3
n=21011
0900
244
42
38
40
11
Clear
0
0.36
73
Light ops overhead in AM. Extensive aerosol bank to west increasing throughout day. Winds increase from west. Light to med ops toward PM as haze extends.
Significant respiratory illness continues.0930 .475
1530 .472
1530 .478
1530 .478
1715 .481
1715 .479
1715 .4740900 402.00
1500 398.75
1700 398.500.0
-0.5
-0.1
RMS=0.3
n=31012
0900
178
38
56
47
7
Mostly Clear
25
0.26
55
Med to heavy operations in conjunction with aerosol based cloud bank that continues from yesterday. Significant respiratory illness continues. Note www.wundergound.com reports conditions as being continuously clear in spite of rapidly increasing "cloud" bank. Note rapid change in local magnetic field not occurring with HAARP magnetometer readings.
1245 .473
1245 .472
1245 .474
1845 .478
1845 .480
1845 .4761115 400.00
1230 402.00
1430 400.50
1600 397.00
1845 399.00
2230 400.501.6
0.8
-1.4
-2.0
0.4
RMS=1.4
n=51013
0900
171
37
30
33
-14
Cloudy
100
0.00
10
Full cloud cover. No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring.
Note changes in local magnetic field not occurring with HAARP magnetometer readings. Sky clears in afternoon. Magnetic field variation decreases as sky clears.0930 .475
0930 .472
0930 .472
1630 .4760800 400.00
0830 399.00
0845 401.25
0945 401.25
1145 398.00
1415 399.50
1500 398.50
1630 398.75
2300 400.750.0
-2.0
9.0
0.0
-1.6
0.6
-1.3
0.2
0.3
RMS=3.2
n=91014
0800
167
65
28
46
13
Mostly Clear
(aerosol based)25
0.28
59
Medium to heavy ops. High level aerosol bank developing. Increasing winds again. HAARP magnetometer shows high activity for a few hours. Limited mag observations. Atmosphere trashed.
0900 .473
0900 .473
0900 .472
1745 .474
1745 .476
1745 .475
1745 .4760830 402.30
0900 402.80
2245 402.000.2
1.0
-0.8
RMS=0.7
n=31015
0830
175
42
38
40
-6
Mostly 'Cloudy'
(aerosol based)25
0.06
38
Light to med ops; a continuing operation. Extensive high level 'cloud' cover is primarily aerosol based. Relatively low level mag activity at HAARP.Extensive aerosol bank developed over ABQ carrying through sunset. Emergency broadcast system becomes active (unnannounced; no intro) on AM bands today. Consider heightened alert status. Numerous reports of heavy ops in varied locations across country. Note increased current with bank over ABQ vs Santa Fe.; Santa Fe cleared approx 2 hrs. prior to sunset. Notice sudden increase in current (i) after clearing of sky. Same event in Espanola 100802. HAARP mag remains quiet.
0930 .477
0930 .473
0930 .4732150 .486
2150 .495
2150 .4910015 402.30
0830 402.50
0900 403.00
1030 404.00
1115 404.00
1815 403.75
2130 405.00
2300 408.00
2355 409.800.2
0.0
1.0
0.6
0.0
-0.0
0.4
2.0
2.0
RMS=1.0
n=91016
0845
165
55
48
51
11
Partly 'Cloudy'
(aerosol based)25
0.28
59
'Cloud' base is completely artificial. A major operation continues-heavy ops. Ops continued throughout previous night visible by moonlight. Low level persistent cough returns; symptoms again consistent with mycoplasma. Reports at CTTUSA of heavy ops across US and Canada continue. CME on sun Oct 14; magnetic filament collapse on Sun Oct 15. Stable I with aerosol bank.
0900 .473
0900 .473
0900 .473
1750 .473
1750 .473
1750 .4730900 409.60
1645 408.00
1800 408.00
2230 407.600.0
-0.2
0.0
-.1
RMS=0.11017
0830
182
51
25
38
-13
Partly Cloudy(significant aerosol influence remains)
50
0.10
27
No ops in AM hours. Effects from major operation over past 5-6 days easily visible. 'Cloud' base is a mix of cumulus, stratus and aerosol base.
Stable I readings remain. Increasing clouds through day. Ops visible near sundown with increased clouds; another storm system degraded or destroyed. ELF meter during day indicates highly stable mag field; measurements concur.0830 .475
0830 .476
0830 .4750800 407.25
1930 407.750.0
0.0
RMS=0.0
n=21018
0900
215
80
26
53
15
Cloudy(significant aerosol influence)
100
0.00
10
No vertical visibility in AM..Exclude from scoring. I and B stable. Mix of cumulus and aerosol base in PM; mostly cloudy.
0900 .473
0900 .473
0900 .475
2145 .476
2145 .471
2145 .474
2145 .4720900 407.20
1030 406.75
1100 406.50
1145 406.75
1300 407.50
1445 407.25
1645 407.00
2215 407.000.0
-0.3
-0.5
0.3
0.6
-0.1
0.1
0.0
RMS=0.3
n=81019
0900
200
73
33
53
0
Mostly Clear
25
0.25
54
No ops. Sky clears.
LF (Low Frequency) Data Monitoring Begins
0900 410.00
2000 406.90
2230 406.750.3
-0.3
0.0
RMS=0.2
n=31020
0830
156
74
33
53
0
Clear
0
0.23
50
No ops. HAARP mag. quiet also.
0830 406.50
2000 406.500.0
0.0
RMS=0.0
n=21021
0900
179
54
29
42
-11
Mostly Clear.
25
0.14
34
No ops. Significant aerosol influence upon 'clouds'. HAARP mag remains quiet. Significant sunspot group has developed, #162. Mag spike at sunset - LF meter correlates.
0015 407.50
0200 407.50
0900 408.00
1115 407.60
1400 407.50
1800 407.00
1845 406.252000 406.25
2400 406.000.2
0.0
0.1
-0.2
-0.0
-0.1
-1.0
0.0
-0.1
RMS=0.4
n=91022
0815
NA
(179 used)62
32
47
5
Mostly Clear
25
0.25
53
No ops. Med.
0800 406.25
1945 406.000.0
0.0
RMS=0.0
n=21023
0815
132
83
26
54
7
Partly Cloudy
50
0.17
40
No ops. Thunder in AM, no rain.
Note solar storm index @100+.
Rain in PM; dynamic extended lightning storm in ABQ. LF meter shows reversal with arrival of rain.0815 405.90
1000 408.20
1300 408.40
1930 405.300.0
1.3
0.1
-0.5
RMS=0.7
n=41024
0900
149
96
26
61
7
Partly Cloudy
50
0.19
44
No ops. Extreme magnetic disturbance at HAARP mag in PM.
Radiosonde data not available
Exclude from scoring.0200 406.20
0830 406.10
2315 408.300.l
0.0
0.1
RMS=0.1
n=31025
0930
149
89
26
57
-4
Mostly Clear
25
0.18
42
No ops overhead in AM.. Radiosonde data not available. Extremely heavy ops begin at midday and carry through afternoon. Heavy aerosol bank visible over ABQ in late AM, extends with heavy aerosol ops over Santa Fe throughout day. LF meter depicts significant aberration. Exclude from scoring.
0945 408.10
1415 406.00
2115 405.800.0
0.4
0.0
RMS=0.2
n=31026
0915
151
71
26
48
-9
Cloudy
100
0.00
10
Radiosonde data not available.Exclude from scoring.Frequent heavy rains.
0930 408.10
1215 408.75
1900 407.50
2000 407.75
2300 407.250.2
0.2
-0.2
0.3
0.2
RMS=0.2
n=51027
0930
143
89
32
61
13
Partly Cloudy
50
0.22
48
No ops.
Note solar storm index @58.
Solar storm index at 1830 is 100+.
Significant magnetic abberation appears on LF meter in afternoon.0930 408.40
1830 408.750.1
0.0
RMS=0.1
n=31028
0830
120
96
23
60
-1
Partly Cloudy
50
0.15
36
No ops.
0830 408.30
0.0
RMS=0.0
n=11029
0815
143
79
30
54
-6
Mostly Cloudy
75
0.07
22
No ops visible w/in clear patches.
LF patterns differ from previous week.0815 408.10
2330 407.700.0
0.0
RMS=0.0
n=21030
0830
168
72
29
51
-3
Mostly Clear
25
0.19
44
No ops.
0830 407.80
0.0
RMS=0
n=11031
0845
182
79
25
52
1
Clear after fog dissipates in AM.
0
0.26
55
No ops directly overhead in AM. Fog in AM, clearing in AM. Major and extensive aerosol bank develops to W-NW on horizon by mid-morning. Aerosol bank extends toward easterly toward Santa Fe by md-afternoon. LF meter shows repeat concave increase in frequency structure in correspondence with encroaching aerosol bank. Sinus allergic response begins.
0030 407.20
0845 407.00
1330 407.40
1730 407.000.0
0.0
0.1
-0.1
RMS=0.1
n=41101
0830
134
79
36
57
5
Mostly Cloudy
75
0.09
26
No ops visible within clear section on northern horizon.
0845 407.6
2200 406.00.0
0.1
RMS=0.1
n=21102
1000
169
81
10
45
-12
Cloudy
100
0.00
10
No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring.
0915 405.2
2100 402.3
2145 403.0-0.1
-0.2
0.9
RMS=0.5
n=31103
0845
177
47
45
46
1
Mostly Clear
25
0.22
48
No ops in AM overhead.. Heavy aerosol based cloud bank in southern sky. High level aerosol based 'clouds' with wave formations overhead. Magnetic field shows increased activity. Solar storm index @78.Strong increase in LF frequency recorded yestereday PM and night. Artificial aerosol bank extends in coverage throughout day; appearance completely artificial. Report of demarcation line to north at Hooper CO. Aerosol ops begin and visible overhead immediately prior to sunset. Note increased magnetometer activity. LF meter shows much activity and requires repeated recalibration.
ELF frequencies detected with developed resonant circuit. Readings found at 2.5Hz (+/- 0.5Hz), 16Hz (+/- 1.0Hz), 21Hz (+/- 1.0Hz) and 31Hz (+/- 1.0Hz). Also 60Hz and 120Hz (2nd harmonic) power grid detected.0130 405.8
0845 405.3
1045 406.2
1815 404.8
2030 403.00.8
-0.1
0.4
-0.2
-0.8
RMS=0.5
n=51104
0845
217
100
2
51
5
Snow
100
0.00
10
No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring. LF meter shows significant rise in frequency throughout previous night. Note magnetometer activity.
0100 402.1
0845 402.2
1000 405.5
2015 406.0-0.2
0.0
2.6
0.0
RMS=1.3
n=31105
0830
166
70
22
46
-5
Clear
0
0.19
43
No ops. LF meter active. HAARP magnetometer active.
0830 405.3
1115 404.8-0.1
-0.2
RMS=0.2
n=21106 0800
175
66
21
43
-3
Clear
0
0.20
46
No ops.
0800 404.1
0.0
RMS=0
n=11107 0930
234
77
43
60
17
Clear
0
0.48
94
Extremely heavy ops on northern horizon and in ABQ in AM hours. Direction of ops is E-W. Aerosol bank extends over Santa Fe region through mid-day. Heavy aerosol ops conducted in SF post 1200.
Notice increased magnetomer activity.0030 407.8
0915 404.0
1015 404.3
1515 407.2
1815 407.80.2
-0.4
0.3
0.6
0.2
RMS=0.4
n=51108
0800
259
43
36
40
-20
Mostly Cloudy
75
0.04
18
No ops visible within clear patches.
Storm front negatively impacted w/ aerosol contamination of atmosphere.0800 407.5
1345 408.30.0
0.2
RMS=0.1
n=21109
0845
252
81
3
42
2
Rain
100
10
No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring. Note magnetometer activity. High winds. Heavy rains at night HAARP has no unusual activity; exceptionally flat magnetometer. Conflict between local mag and HAARP again.
0845 411.2
1300 408.8
1715 406.1
2130 402.2
2200 401.0
2400 400.20.2
-0.6
-0.6
0.9
2.4
0.4
RMS=1.1
n=61110
Rain
100
0.00
10
No vertical visibility. Exclude from scoring.
1111
0830
219
53
33
43
1
Mostly Cloudy
75
0.10
28
No ops visible within clear patches.
0830 408.1
0.2 1112
0900
197
67
25
46
3
Clear
0
0.27
57
No ops in AM. Extremely heavy ops begin at midday in narrow 20 degree band essentially directly overhead. Appears as a target zone. Aerosol bank diffuses overhead in localized region. Extremely heavy ops begin in afternoon and carry through day. Ops visible at night. Emergency broadcast comes on unannounced. Higher threat level implied through this and news accounts.Minimum no. of mag. readings.
0900 407.2
1200 406.80.0 1113
0830
155
43
55
49
3
Clear w/exception to heavy ops
0
0.23
50
Extremely heavy ops. Major activity. Minimum no.of mag. readings.
0900 404.0
0.0 1114
0845
182
67
43
55
6
Mostly Cloudy
75
0.11
30
No ops visible. Cloud development signicantly degraded by aerosol base. Note low mag reading.
0845 397.6
-0.3 1115
0900
185
89
30
60
5
Clear
0
0.31
64
Direct observations not available. Exclude from scoring.
1116
0900
185
72
25
49
-11
Clear
0
0.16
39
Direct observations not available. Exclude from scoring. Heavy ops in Durango CO.
1117
0900
162
46
42
44
-5
Clear
0
0.18
42
Direct observations not available. Exclude from scoring.ot available. Exclude from scoring. Heavy ops in Durango CO. Heavy ops in ABQ reported.
1118
0900
139
36
25
31
-13
Clear
0
0.10
27
No ops. Increased winds.
0930 396.3
1119
0900
119
43
41
42
11
Clear
0
0.21
47
No ops. Aerosol bank visible on W. horizon in afternoon.
0900 397.5
1120
0930
105
46
32
39
-3
Clear
0
0.13
32
No ops. Solar storm index @100+
0930 403.9
1121
0900
108
51
19
35
-4
Clear
0
0.12
31
No ops.
0900 408.7
1122
0900
143
65
19
42
7
Clear
0
0.22
42
No ops during day. Ops begin at night, visible by moonlight.
1123
0800
124
57
33
45
3
Minimal natural cloud cover; aerosol banks increasing.
0
0.18
42
Heavy ops apparently conducted at night; heavy aerosol bank over ABQ and extending towards Santa Fe. Med op activity overhead. Note earlier active solar storm index on 1120.
0800 403.2
1124
0915
126
44
17
30
-14
Clear
0
0.08
24
No ops.
0915 407.3
1125
0900
120
75
40
58
28
Partly Cloudy; heavy aerosol compent to 'cloud' base
50
0.31
52
Heavy ops in mid-day. Numerous reports of heavy activities across country..
1126
0915
106
45
27
36
-22
Mostly Clear; aerosol bank on southern horizon.
25
0.05
18
No ops
0915 403.2
11274
0900
100
63
32
47
11
Clear
0
0.19
44
No ops
0900 403.2
Readers may see that the model over the interval considered is showing a fairly high level of accuracy in predicting when conditions for aerosol operations are more favorable for this region. It is to be understood that the model is NOT expected to predict the actual occurrence of operations; only the existence of favorable conditions for the operations. A failure of the model occurs when a low index value is computed but observations of heavy aerosol operations occur overhead. Failure can not be positively established when a high index is computed and heavy aerosol operations DO NOT occur, as suitable CONDITIONS only are considered within the model. Specific additional environmental and physical factors that produce failure are to be identified at that time; other citizens may wish to contribute to that goal. Additional evaluations over time will demonstrate the success or failure of this model.
It is of interest to discuss how the consideration of solar activity has come to be incorporated into this model in addition to the previous consideration of relative humidity alone. This brings to attention the events of and surrounding July 27 of this year. Observations of aerosol activity prior to this date, especially during the months of June and the first half of July 2002 appeared to be declining based upon commonly used reporting sources. During the last week of July, this appeared to change as reports suddenly and dramatically increased. On July 27 2002 the following public report was made by Lorie Kramer, a sincere and dedicated activist of Chemtrail Tracking USA:"BLITZ in SW Houston, Sat Jul 27 2002
This is the absolute WORST spraying I have seen in quite a few months. They are laying it down and have been since early morning. The smear is thicker than I've seen for 2 years. INCREDIBLE. I bought a disposable camera but won't be able to get the film developed until tomorrow or Monday, when I do I'll post it. CREEPS!"
The same intensity of aerosol operations was further confirmed by simultaneous observations in New Mexico and Colorado from equally reliable sources. One must ask, what was unique in an environmental, meteorological or geophysical sense on or around the date of July 27, 2002 that might affect the sudden increase in intensive operations? One factor which deserves close attention is the daily sunspot number, as it ranked upon this date as one of the highest values seen within recent years. The monthly sunspot number in June had declined to 84.5, one of the lowest values of the three previous years. The daily sunspot number on July 27 reached a peak of 323, and remained at an extremely high level for several days before and after this date. This event, combined with humidity studies during the last year and a half, as well as consideration of the ionization properties of barium (see previous research) is unique enough to warrant further evaluation in the model that has been developed above. Observations over time will determine if the hypothesis of solar energy combined with humidity aspects is justified or not; studies to confirm or refute the model are welcomed by other citizens.
Scoring the model:
There are several different methods by which the model above may be evaluated; a favorable result appears to be produced by a variety of tests at this point. The means that will be chosen to evaluate is Spearman's correlation, a non-parametric statistical test which does not require any assumptions about the distribution of the data. Spearman's correlation is dependent upon a ranking system, which is more reasonable in this case to accomodate any subjective qualities of the observational data that is to be used. The following ranking system will be used for the observational data:
0-50 None to light ops
50-80 Light to medium ops
80-100 Medium to heavy opsThe midpoint of these intervals will be used to establish a ranking system. The details of this statistical test will not be explained here; readers may wish to refer to "Practical Statistics" by Russell Langley, Dover, 1970 for further information. The reader is not expected to follow the mechanics of this test procedure without the use of this reference or its equivalent.
The test will be completed as follows for the period from 082102 to 110802 and on 072702, with excluded values as noted above. As the tabulation of all data is lengthy, the only the final tabulations and z score computation will be shown:
n = 68
Sum of D 2 = 28264
Ties:t 50 = 1
10412 ( 1) = 10412.5
t 9 = 2
60 (2) = 120
t 2 = 11
0.5 (11) = 5.5
t 3 = 6
2 (6) = 12
t 4 = 1
5 ( 1) = 5
Sum = 10555
D 2 + T = 38819
(1 / 6) * (n 3 - n) = 54, 740
38819 / 54740 = .709
1 - .709 = .291
Z = 68 1/2 * (.291) = 2.40Z is significant at 98% level.From the reference above (page 204), the z score for this data set is computed at 2.40. The results of this test are therefore significant at the 98%+ level. This indicates a likely significant correlation between the model data and the observational data. Correlation does not infer causality. The results of this test demonstrate that the model proposed is worthy of continued use.
-
shamus100
Wow, check out the bolded parts of your 'scientist'.
Holy frick, what's wrong here!!!
MORGELLONS:
PATHOGENS & THE GENERAL POPULATION
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 08 2008I have no medical expertise and I claim none. I am not offering any medical advice or diagnosis with the presentation of this information. I am acting solely as an independent researcher providing the results of extended observation and analysis of unusual biological conditions that are evident.
There is increasing evidence that the general population may be affected by at least four pathogenic forms. Any perception that only a small segment of the population is affected by the so-called Morgellons condition may be quite false. Certain pathogenic forms are repeatedly showing up in a majority of human biological samples that have been observed, regardless of whether or not visible skin anomalies appear. The use of unusual skin conditions as a defining criteria of the existence of the "Morgellons condition" appears to be completely inadequate and it does not appear to encompass the severity, extent and distribution of the pathogenic forms.
The pathogenic forms are as follows:
-
sooner7nc
Skamania County Ordinance
Ordinance No. 69-01
Be it hereby ordained by the Board of County Commissioners of Skamania County:
Whereas, there is evidence to indicate the possible existence in Skamania County of a nocturnal primate mammal variously described as an ape-like creature or a sub-species of Homo Sapiens; and
Whereas, both legend and purported recent sightings and spoor support this possibility, and
Whereas, this creature is generally and commonly known as a "Sasquatch", "Yeti", "Bigfoot", or "Giant Hairy ape", and has resulted in an influx of scientific investigators as well as casual hunters, many armed with lethal weapons, and
Whereas, the absence of specific laws covering the taking of specimens encourages laxity in the use of firearms and other deadly devices and poses a clear and present threat to the safety and well-being of persons living or traveling within the boundaries of Skamania County as well as to the creatures themselves,
Therefore be it resolved that any premeditated, wilful and wanton slaying of such creature shall be deemed a felony punishable by a fine not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) and/or imprisonment in the county jail for a period not to exceed Five (5) years.
Be it further resolved that the situation existing constitutes an emergency and as such this ordinance is effective immediately.
ADOPTED this 1st day of April, 1969.
The above ordinance was partially repealed and amended in 1984 by Ordinance 1984-2:
The ordinance was amended to make the crime a gross misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in the county jail and/or a $1000 fine.
The new ordinance also created a million-acre refuge within the County.
Board of Commissioners of Skamania County
-
shamus100
FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL!!!
INTERNET NONSENSE!
TOTAL AND UTTER INTERNET NONSENSE!!!
Prove me wrong - give me a credible source. That one I'm done with. NEXT! ** sips tea **
-
ProdigalSon
Want any more "proof"?
It's all here....
AEROSOL CRIMES
&COVER UP copyright 1999-2011 by Clifford E CarnicomYeah, they're making all this up.... 'cause they have nothin better to do....
-
shamus100
There plastered all over the net. THEY'RE CONSPIRACY WEBSITES. Didn't we go over this like ten pages ago?
Dear god man, you have the balls to call me stupid?
Here's some freakoids if anyone wants a good laugh. www.prisonplanet.com
Endless hilarity! Read the message board, THE MESSAGE BOARD!
-
