I have to hand it to the Society. They understand the power of organization. They demonstrate that no matter how ridiculous your message and how much the facts don't support your position you can still accomplish a lot if you are organized. I think we could learn a lot from them.
We have the truth and the evidence on our side. We have considerable numbers. We are making an impact but nowhere near the limits of our potential IMO. Even those with a very broad and nebulous anti-establishment agenda, even those doing it primarily for a laugh, groups like Anonymous, have proven to be more effective with a minimum of organization.
Surely we can do more damage?
By damage I mean causing the WT to lose members and prevent them gaining new ones. I also mean giving them the maximum amount of bad publicity and exposure.
How can we do this? Obviously I'm only speaking to those who want to do this. I know and understand the position of those who don't really care or don't feel any more can be accomplished. I'm speaking to those who feel more can be accomplished and who are eager to get stuck in.
Would a kind of loose knit 'Anti-Org' give people more a sense of community and direction in the fight against the WT? Would it lead to more action effective action being taken against the WT? I believe so. People are strong when they group together for a common cause and agree to a common course of action, or series of them ('Operations' as Anonymous refers to their actions).
What about a brainstorming session? Ideas? How could we use our numbers to make use of he media, for instance?
What about a series of orchestrated public debates, in which those from our numbers who have the knowledge and confidence to take on the Society over various issues (their failed predictions, changed dates, blood policy, the UN hypocrisy etc - anything that would expose their hidden history and dirty laundry) publicly challenge local elders or Society reps to public debates in cities all around the country, or even in many countries, inviting members of the public, JW's and local journalists etc to attend (funding for venues etc. by supporters of these ventures)? Then, when the JW reps don't attend, as is likely, a presentation of the facts goes ahead and the point is made that the JW's are too scared and secretive to face debate. People could post flyers advertising it, and newspaper and radio adverts. It could serve as a massive warning anti-witnessing campaign.
What about doing this online? Challenges and invitations offered to attend Skype type video or audio conference/debates, advertised through facebook and email lists? The JW's can be destroyed in open debate by someone armed with the facts and their own literature.
Just thinking out loud. Any other ideas?