Blog Update (page 14)

I concur with sab at sweetbaby

you still get a gold star for effort.

Hey, I wanted a star for being facetious. It took zero effort.

ad hominem fallacy notverylikely

I don't think calling someone ignorant should always be considered personal attack. You have stated pretty bold "facts" with no supporting evidence.

Ad hominem misdirects from the debate, I think this usage of the term ignorant is on topic.

-Sab

Hey, I wanted a star for being facetious. It took zero effort.

Then give me that gold star back!

-Sab

agreed notverlikely and thats what you were doing

Then give me that gold star back!

I never got it! You quit trying to pull a Walmart scam.

sab I think notverylikely can speak for himself

I never got it! You quit trying to pull the Walmart scam.

Are you referring to my strategic use of smiley's?

-Sab

I don't think calling someone ignorant should always be considered personal attack.

I did not say HE was ignorant, just that the idea of strongly judging to be discriminate on your way of a cult is judging in ignorance.

Of course, that had nothing to do with his assertions regarding what Paul wrote or first century atheists.

Blog Update