Can we trust this website? (About the subject in which Jehovah's Witnesses were a NGO) (page 12)

isaacaustin

Reniaa, you have already broken a JW rule by coming here, called associating with apostates. That is considered worse than lying in dubland. Why are you afraid to lie and deny you are Reniaa?

isaacaustin

LOL That is a good one Outlaw! Reniaa is ashamed to be Reniaa! I don't blame her, I would be too!

possible-san

Spade.

I think any active Witness that comes on this board would be the target of acidic hate.

I beg to differ.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/bible/193946/1/Are-you-an-active-Jw-or-an-ex-jw

Well, the frequenters in my Japanese forum are "active" JWs.
There are also some active "elders" in it.
My friends are those active JWs.

They made PDFs of the Watchtower magazine which I introduced in this forum formerly.
I said "Please be thankful to them (my friends, active JWs)."
(Although many people did not appreciate.)

And also in this forum, probably, there is almost no person who attacks "honest" JWs, IMO.
(For instance, I have not found that Mr. isaacaustin attacked sincere/honest JW in this forum.)
Of course, people express their own opinion, respectively.

possible

Black Sheep

It is totally unimportant who a poster is.

It doesn't matter who they are, or how many personalities they post as, or if they are pro or anti whatever you believe, or if you like, or dislike them ........

............ Just discuss the subject.

Everything else they suck you into is a distraction...........

...... and they win.

If you can't handle them in an internet forum, they'll make mince meat of you in real life.

Learn your lessons here.

TweetieBird

I have not read everyone else's comments so if this was already stated, I apologize.

In a nutshell, if they were not doing anything wrong by their relationship to the UN, then why did they QUICKLY disassociate themselves when the Guardian article came out? The bible says that the GUILTY run when no one pursues.

Why not have a WT article explaining that it is okay to be an NGO instead of trying to cover it up?

possible-san

designs.
Listener.
isaacaustin.
coffee_black.
Black Sheep.
debator.
CuriousButterfly.
thetrueone.
OUTLAW.
caliber.
palmtree67.
PSacramento.
Ice cream.
nugget.
inbetween.
Spade.
TweetieBird.

Thank you for your comments.

OUTLAW.

Thank you always.

But I do not dislike her/him.
Because, I myself was once a defender of Jehovah's Witnesses.

And I was attacked by people in this forum as you know.
For instance, "impossible-san."

In addition, I was attacked from the beginning when I have done no bad things to them. LOL
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/bible/162416/1/very-important-material

isaacaustin.

I read your PM.
Thanks.
I'd like to reply to you afterward.

possible

OUTLAW

Hey Possible-San..

I think there was a laguage barrier when you first came..

You don`t speak english..

It took a while for people to figure that out..

Debator/Reniaa does`nt make any sense..

I doubt she will ever figure that out..

LOL!!..

A beer for you Possible-San..

..................... ...OUTLAW

isaacaustin

Wait, Outlaw you do not buy Reniaa's answers to why the Wt was a NGO to the DPI?

It was only so they could use the library! LOL

OUTLAW

LOL@Isaacaustin!!..

The WBT$ could have requested a UN book from the UN library,from any USA library..

There was never any need for the WBT$ to Join the UN-NGO,so they could get a UN Library Book..

The WBT$ knows it and Debator/Reniaa knows it..

Both have established themselves as Deceivers,Manipulators and Liars..

........................ ...OUTLAW

Can we trust this website? (About the subject in which Jehovah's Witnesses were a NGO)

Share this