by TooBad TooSad 304 Replies latest members adult
Does it matter if it's stinging or not? It's imposing the views of the Governing Body in an area where they've no interest being. You've been shown a quote that matched your original criteria; this century.
Now you're looking for a 2009 article.
This proves, I believe, that you're only here to make trouble.
Reniaa, you also said that OP was lying as you couldn't believe such statements would be in a public talk. You said the Organisation doesn't teach such things any longer.
Are you willing to recognise that the OP wasn't lying and that the Org does teach such things?
1983 is a long time ago maybe we will get an update soon! and lay this whole conversation to rest. I see others living the life of Jws and find the reality is not the negative spin on here would make it.
i'll accept you found one footnote and one talk you have yet to provide an article more recent than 1983 that teaches it or any examples of people being rebuked for it recently.
And I provided a quote showing what is between a married couple is between them to discuss and share as a couple who are married.
the original poster said it was in a recent study talk last sunday he provided no proof and niether did you!
1983 isn't that long ago. Your assertions that the WTS no longer holds such views has been proved to be false. It's not negative spin to point out what the Governing Body is actually saying, is it?
There already has been an update but you won't do your homework and you choose not to believe what others have brought to light on the subject. Even if you had the proof in your hot little hands you still wouldn't believe it.
""There are none so blind as those who will not see. The most deluded people are those who choose to ignore what they already know."
Reniaa, if the footnote in the article points back to the 1983 WT, that means the article containing the footnote is re-teaching the 1983 article. This isn't hard to grasp, you know.
1983 is 25 years ago and mrs jones were is the update, all I got shown was a footnote from 2007.
The footnote re-emphases the 1983 teaching. Are you deliberately being obtuse?
Reniaa, oral sex has been discussed in at least two WT studies at the Kingdom Hall in the past 18 months. I know because I was there and took my children out both times because I consider it age inappropriate.
