Dear Lenza and any lurkers,
not sure if you will be visiting again..something tells me you just might.
anyway...it is IS good to have other than the norm for the board, viewpoint. In the least it reminds us all how things are with some of our friends and maybe how many of us used to be and think as well.
anyway, i hope you will come back to the forum.
i wont' get into any issues that you might have raised with your post and i am sure some of the forumites will probably have some fun with you as they like to do.
i only want to say one thing, and maybe this is for the lurkers out there...
The whole "Imperfect Excuse" whether limited to individuals or extended to the Organization...its a good one. And you know it would be acceptable to everyone IF IT ALSO corresponded with TOLERANCE within the Organization and all of its natural and rational implications were carried out.
In other words, the problem is not that the Org or persons in it are imperfect, we all know that after all. The problem is that the Org does not allow its members or anyone else to make anything other than EXCUSES with that reasoning.
It is not acceptable for us to logically and rationally extend the Imperfect Excuse to take a position as simple as...the Org or the FDS or the GB are imperfect, THEREFORE, what they are teaching us is also imperfect. Or how they are doing things is also imperfect., etc. etc.
The Imperfect Excuse is reserved for bad behaviour, error and falsehood but somehow it is not understood that it should also apply to what is perceived to be or held to be good, right and truth. These things too are imperfect and when we admit that they are..then we allow for the possibility of alternatives: alternative thought, alternative decisions, alternative choices and alternative sources.
Put very simply: the fact is that JWs, the Org, the FDS, the GB, the Elders, whoever...want everyone to behave and act and believe as though it IS perfect...but simultaneously, they want to reserve the "out" of imperfection whenever it is suitable and convenient.
Sorry but that doesn't fly with rational persons.
-Eduardo