Revelation 1.17 Jesus divinity? Or just "the first" raised from the dead"?

by Hellrider 239 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Kenneson
    Kenneson

    Mondo1,

    Does "Mother" know about this? Hmmm.

  • Deputy Dog
    Deputy Dog

    double post. sorry!

  • Deputy Dog
    Deputy Dog

    Mondo

    The questions are faulty because they assume that I believe Jesus is Michael, which I don't..

    The WTBTS does! Should I provide more proof? Would you like to separate yourself even more from the WT?

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    Mondo:
    Fair comment, but you need to play fair in the game called "conversation". I'm sure it's not beyond your intellectual capacity to articulate your feelings on what Jesus was before, during, and after his sojourn on earth. Further, it wouldn't be that hard to substitute that concept into the questions Ellderwho asks.

    Do you think the pre-incarnate Jesus was some kind of an angel, for instance (leaving aside whether or not he was specifically named Michael)?

    Personally I don't think he is/was Michael, either.

  • Deputy Dog
    Deputy Dog

    LT

    I think Mondo, doesn't want to be accountable for or have to explain why he differs from what the WT teaches. Lets see if he has any nerve.

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    You could be right. But he's anonymous enough here to spill a gut and enjoy the cut and thrust of debate and discussion. While it's challenging, no-one is likely to lose an eye

  • Mondo1
    Mondo1

    Littletoe,

    The issue is that they assumed something. Never assume. :)

    I would argue that Jesus was an angel of sorts, for an angel is merely a messenger and he was undoubtedly "the angel of the convenant" spoken of in Mal. 3:1.

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    Mondo:

    Never assume.

    Sounds like a reasonable premise

    Regarding the term "angel", we're all familiar with the wide implications of that term, that have less to do with nature and more to do with role, yes?

    May I raise 1.Cor.15 again? I quoted it to you before on one of these threads, but you may have missed my implication. Do you conceive that there may be different "kinds" of being in the spirit realm, just as there are different kinds of flesh in the physical realm?

    I'm wondering if this is how you perhaps characterise the difference between the father, the Son, and Angels (perhaps even distinguishing between different classes of angel, such as Cherubim, Seraphim, and Archangel). If not, would you mind expanding on how you do view this, please?

  • Mondo1
    Mondo1

    Correct. Little to do with nature. Yes I would agree that there can be different kinds of spirits. I'm not sure how you want me to go about characterizing the differences though, because the Bible doesn't do hardly do that at all, and so I could only speculate and I prefer not to do that.

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    Oh, go on, you know you want to. A little speculation is good for the soul

    You've actually partially done it, in that you appear to be presenting the idea that there's a rank order in "kinds" of spirit being that goes along the lines of Father > Son > Angel. I assume I've picked that up correctly, and look to you to correct me if I have not.

    To widen this particular point, where do you see ressurected humans fitting into this arrrangement? Do they become the same kind of being as the Son, or some lower order?

    I'm not trying to trip you up here, hence I'll candidly state that if they are of the same order as the Son (for example) then I'd then like you to explain how this might relate to the Son's role as "God", if indeed it has any impact at all. But I don't want to jump the gun. I'm just attempting to show you where my mind is going with all this.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit