Good gawd. Posting to you Abaddon, is like giving heroin to an addict. You break apart every sentence that you may squeeze out every last drop which may feed your aching ego and give you more fodder for mockery. Having honed it to a rare art form you are quite the gem in that regard. However, such a talent does not make you the trustee of truth and knowledge, nor mean your interpretations of evidence are the only valid ones. In fact it subtracts from them.
The most immediate evidence available is a persons own observations. So, those who give the summary and documentary I posted an honest, open and thorough examination, may discover a wide tapestry of events and circumstances (dots), which when connected strongly suggest complicity. Like moving out from the tiny dots within a picture in a magazine, stepping back and viewing many of the occurrences prior to, during, and after 9/11 reveals a comprehensive pattern, an order or impression which can add great significance and understanding to each otherwise seemingly isolated event.
It is not the individual dots in themselves which are so important. Looking randomly at single specks of evidence -- void of the wider view -- presents us with drastically differing and confusing interpretations; which is the nature of critical thinking and falsifiability (no theory can be considered scientific if it does not admit to contrary observation). Contrary observations rarely if ever amount to proof or truth; and that's all we have in front of us here. Interesting how this so easily satisfies otherwise intelligent people. I guess as long as you think you are proving yourself right, that's all that matters. The dire situation we may find ourselves in, is of little if any concern.
Interpretation of an isolated dot does not equal truth or proof one way or the other. Interpretation and opinion of a hundred isolated dots, and hundreds of pages of thread, does not equal truth or proof. I've seen this first hand over the past months reading through hundreds of pages of unresolved pissing contests on other forums. I choose not to go there, and so have posted little to this thread. Instead I have left it up to folks to study the material -- which I feel helps in some ways supply a much needed larger picture -- if they desire, and come to their own conclusions and sense of action, if any.
It will likely be the unhindered and thorough examination of events with the larger clarifying pattern in mind that will expose authentic proof one way or the other; and it will take far more expertise and open minded examination than what is available here. That's why my only conclusion is that we desperately need unhindered investigations far deeper and wider than those which have been officially performed so far. That this does not satisfy some, is not my problem.
j
