LDHHowever, health care and health insurance are two different things. Some here do not feel that it's right for everyone to be entitled to a Yugo, but some can afford a Cadillac. I happen to disagree. I would love to have $50,000 to spend on plastic surgery for a nip and tuck here and there like the bimbos I see on TV. But you know what? I don't have disposable income for that. So, as far as those people are concerned, I'm DRIVING A YUGO just like all of you.
You see, Lisa, you think about how you, "would love to have $50,000 to spend on plastic surgery for a nip and tuck here and there like the bimbos I see on TV." To me, that is how you come across sometimes as a little shallow. Thoughts like 'plastic surgery' never even fly thru people's minds who cannot get insurance. (Except if their faces are burned or disfigured) They are concerned about more concrete things -- like living.
I did not intend to attack you. I intended to say you come across as 'shallow' or maybe just inexperienced or innocently ignorant. Before I had back problems, I never truly understood how absolutely painful every day & every task could be. Just lying in bed or turning over was agony. At the time I had great insurance and I got one of the best doctors available. I had great results and have no back pain whatsoever now. I understand & symphatize with with back pain sufferers, much more than I did before. When I say 'innocently ignorant' that is what I mean. I think if you lost your job and/or insurance and you suffered a 'reversal of fortune' , you may look at things quite differently. Life has a way of doing that.
Here's the thing, I fail to see how I am any more or less 'deserving' of that great surgeon NOW (without ins) as I was THEN (with ins). For that matter -- the same thing should apply to a Wal-Mart checker or someone on welfare -- my health isn't more or less important than theirs! If you help people they CAN be productive and get back to work. Breaking them financially only puts them on the govt. welfare roles, to me that is counter-productive.
It's a shame you chose not to comment on my (and thousands of others) situation with uninsurability -- except that you agreed I was a guaranteed loss for the insurance co. (your obvious concern). I know that, as a matter of fact, I told you that. But, you indignantly compared my having a costly disability (epilepsy) as "pissing in the pool."
You never commented on the Texas Risk Pool (other states have then, too). All co.'s that do business in Texas must participate, they all take a 'risk'.
So what the Ins. Co.'s do first: They deny 'normal' coverage to people like me with epilepsy or hundreds of other costly diseases.
This leaves you 3 choices:
1.) Force you into the 'Risk Pool' where everyone (working & that can afford it) is that have been denied 'normal' coverage. The premium is so high because you're in that same pool with all those other inconsiderate folks "pissing in the pool," you know, those pesky asthmatics, cancer & heart patients, hemodialysis patients (they really "piss" a lot) even those expensive AIDS patients (there's a lot of innocent ones you know) and many, many others. (a really pissy-pissy pool)
2.) Welfare. If you're already a "welfare bum", no worries, you already have free (Yugo) health care coverage. If you stay in the 'Risk Pool' very long, you too, can become a "welfare bum" when you go bankrupt. Or just quit your job (or get fired for taking too much sick time) .
3.) Suffer & die. Geez, who do you think you are anyway ? A citizen of the most advanced, charitable & richest country on earth ?
If the 'risk pool' were truly fair it would not be a lot of different pools. Just one great big one -- with everyone in it. Base the premiums on that. Business as usual, NO ! Obscene profits should be against the law when it comes to health care. Even Utility Co.'s are regulated, so don't have a heart attack (unless you have insurance).
You know as well as I do that Health Ins. companies only want healthy customers. The only time they will accept epilepsy, for instance is in a huge group. You or your spouse has to work for a big company. About 50% of the businesses (like mine) are small businesses, which I can tell you, gives me no clout whatsoever in negotiating prices or coverage. Every year they put new restrictions on what they will cover or how long since you've been treated for a particular thing. They effectively, systematically try to cut out liability for anything that costs them money.
Just business, huh ? A profit is fine. An obscene profit is inhumane. We are not talking about 'elective' procedures, we're talking about basic health care. If there needs to be a total overhaul of the system, fine.
Lisa, I am sure you are not heartless and I know you personally cannot 'fix' the system. I have nothing against you at all, I promise. What you see is an attack, but, not against 'Lisa'. The attack is against your defense of the insurance industry -- an industry that has calculated you and I are much less of a liability -- if we are dead.
As long as we don't take too much time getting there...
Sincerely,
Rabbit