prologos
JoinedTopics Started by prologos
-
10
Who says Perfect Humans were created, [evolved] to live forever? WT does*, genesis does not. do you?
by prologos inthe only reference to living forever, (or indefinitely long) in the genesis 2&3 account, is in reference to the "tree of life".
gen 3:22 "--eat and live to time indefinite--".
this tree must have been hard to find because wt writers opined that eventually, in their faithful course, a&e would be led to that allowed tree to gain everlasting life's symbolic confirmation.. therefore as the ancients accidentally & correctly wrote, humans did not have inherent everlasting life, but it was gained through diet.
-
8
weekly bible reading question: Paul recommended disfellowshipping the immoral man, why not the lady involved?
by prologos ini cor.
5 ---- was she out of the reach of the elders, because she was an unbaptized subject?--- were ladies of less important to paul's thinking?
, like the primary blame on adam for "sin" rather than eve's?-- for those that still find the talking snake saga worthy of discussion for one reason or another.
-
2
Who wins the tall tale contest: talking snake or F&DS (1919) Inc?
by prologos intelling improbable stories, like.
baron von muenchhausen, after whom a whole mental disorder is named*,.
gives rise to this contest:.
-
27
Unintended fallout from July 15 WT on "Anointed & Generation"?
by prologos injesus, as reported in math 24:34 said: "--this generation --will by no means pass away until all these things occur.".
the 'all' in the jesus quotation above would include the biggest all of them all,.
allmageddon?
-
45
The Elusive and Shy creator god.---
by prologos inis there only a 50 / 50 chance that there is a ceator or.
assuming that there is one, and looking at it all,- it is hard to imagine that there is not,.
particularly if you tried all your life to make stuff work.
-
3
looking at your life, your character, of what Tribe in Rev. 7 you think you are?
by prologos ingiven the great importance that wt attaches to the 144 000, there is an alledged .
personal involvment for all humans in the rev.7 description of that number.
its a story about angels that.
-
23
At what point in the story did WT get it wrong, went off at a tangent?
by prologos inlooking at the bible narrative now, with open mind, the talking snake and all, it is a poorly contrived story.
all these clever people picking up and adding to the thread, the fabric its intriguing, certainly a valued literary work.
fiction.. using this story wt has woven another, parallel account that you would expect to harmonize with it, and hopefully attempt to connect with reality.. in your thinking, where did wt become unhinged, drifted off into total detachment?.