Maybe less than 10% if we are honest ?
And Bible studies that is a real joke isn`t it ? WT literature study is more like it.
how much of the preaching hours in yearly report you think are real?
they always have high numbers preaching hours.
probably increase every decade.
Maybe less than 10% if we are honest ?
And Bible studies that is a real joke isn`t it ? WT literature study is more like it.
for the lucid lurkers: # 37. the article's examples really show, that among the 'name people' only 50 % of rank and file, and none of the leaders can be trusted all the time.
but, shut up and put up.. eli and hannah, eli's sons committed gross sins, raping/ seducing woman visitors to the temple, for years, yet naive worshippers are to trust their brothers, even with their children ?
inaction by wt approved?
"And I have alot to say for the arrogant elder who works for me. He is not very honest and not a stand up guy."
Foolednomore ,My question for you would be ,why do you still employ him ?
see: https://7news.com.au/news/crime/senior-jehovahs-witnesses-member-charged-with-rape-torture-and-assault-of-teenage-boys-c-8044666.
"senior jehovah’s witnesses member charged with rape, torture and assault of teenage boys...".
the 61 year-old man "faces 21 counts of rape, 17 counts of sexual assault, 13 counts of procuring sexual acts by false pretence and one count each of incest, torture and common assault.".
Not a few of us are watching this space with more than the average interest .
probably, the greatest advocacy for the gospels is the jw publication: the greatest man that ever lived.
it convinced me.. everything else that the bible says about the resurrection and eternal life logically follows.. the testimony of a “witness” in court matters only if it is observation not commentary ( expert witness is also commentary): what did you see, what did you hear, what is the magnitude of your measurement.
not, are you convinced; that is only belief.
The short answer is a resounding NO.
i am genuinely curious and mainly posting this for research purposes, i do not have enough knowledge on either of these subjects to debate them in any useful manner.. (this information is as far as i am aware and may be incorrect in places)as most know the nwt is known for placing a form of the divine name in the nt (new testament) - while i agree the evidence is significantly weak for it too appear in the nt, a few things must be considered - (from my limited research)rev references the name twice (3:12, 14:1)early copies of the lxx contain the divine name (likely the versions that the nt writers copied?
stafford has a couple of videos on this subject)it was emphasized over and over the name [divine name, which ever form you prefer] would be "known" (other words used aswell) forever - if this is true, why then go against your own message in some cases and replace it with a surrogate?some also claim the nwt is dishonest for not translating some occurrences of "lord" as the divine name - common ones i notice are: phil 2:10-11, 1pe 3:14-15, heb 1:10yet these all use "lord" as a title not a proper noun, seems to be staunch trinitarians who make this claim most oftenscholar qualifications:why does a scholars qualification's matter?
sounds dumb i know.
I am certainly not a scholar by any definition and don`t claim to be.It just seems to me that if there is a GOD he/she doesnt seem to care whether it`s name is known or not ?
2000 years after the last book of the Bible was penned and their is a number of versions as to what pronunciation that name could have been .
Jehovah`s Witnesses of course use that name however in the 1`st edition of "Aid To Bible Understanding" the writers admitted that Yahweh maybe a more correct pronunciation of Gods name ,however they settled on Jehovah as that was the most popular name used at that time ?
Used by whom I ask ?
Christendom..... whom they say are apostates ? False religion .
Just my 2 cents worth. as one who spent approx.32 years in the religion until I finally woke up.
breaking news....there is hope for good hearted non-jws!!!.
according to sergio:.
are jehovah's witnesses the only ones to be saved during the end time?.
Truly I say to you, whatever things you may bind on earth will be things already bound in heaven, and whatever things you may loosen on earth will be things already loosened in heaven.
Doesn`t the Roman Catholic religion apply this to themselves ?
And at least they have been here for the past 2000 years .
thesis: when someone who is given a responsibility mistakes that responsibility for authority, bullying is very likely to occur.. jesus spoke an illustration recorded at matthew 24: 45-51 which well illustrates this thesis.. jesus asked, “who really is the faithful and discreet slave whom his master appointed over all his domestics, to give them their food at the proper time?
happy is that slave if his master on arriving finds him doing so.
truly i say to you, he will appoint him over all his belongings.
tbk , Nw, says it all for me ,
Nowwhat for the win!
First, it is a parable. Second, in this parable there isn't a separate evil slave from the faithful slave. Third, there is no mention or even insinuation in this parable that there is a class of people who comprise said slave.
Sums it up nicely.
i have just started to steep the mincemeat for my mince pies in dark rum .
christmas is a big deal in my family and circle of friends.
however among ex jws it's a bit different or so l understand.
I grew up with Xmas so it is never a problem with me to celebrate with friends and family and i see it as a good time without the religious experience
here's my list of jw no-no's as i recall: .
1. no giving or accepting valentine candy for students.
2. no going to home coming football games.
wozza,
One of the police officers was and older man and he was in the administration office while the much younger guy was a motor cycle cop.
i think it's been a while since this was asked.
tell us your hobbies, interests, pastimes, whatever you find enjoyable as a diversion from work and school.
i am lucky enough to live in a small cabin on a lake, i enjoy rowing my old boat and fishing, i play with car projects, and we travel as much as we can.
about the difficult thing about owning a dog, I think that could apply to owning a cat, too!
Dying that is.
We had both for many ,many years our dog travelled with us as we moved interstate over 2000 miles by car and our cat came down by plane once we had settled in .
I cried when both eventually passed and especially with our toy poodle "Lillie" that became my dog we had them both for about 16 years,