on item 4, a lengthy read: The 3 judges rejected the wt appeal, which maintained that the judge in the previous decision had acted with personal prejudice in his ruling against JW practises foisted by the divorced a jw mother on her daughters.
The non-jw father , a Pharmacist, had asked that first court to curtail his former wife's wt activities, particularly the h2h time, and the single judge had agreed, but the 3 appeal court judges disagreed with wt. The prejudice against wt is not personal, it is universal.