Absolutely it is playing semantics. This is the core question that started my awakening process.
In fact you can make a good case that being "guided" should be amore accurate and perfect process than being "inspired!"
I am a photographer and if I do a job where someone "inspired" me then end result is my creation, it may just be influenced from an idea or a piece that someone else created. The person or work inspiring me has little control over the end result. Whereas if someone is "directing" me in the job then they have full control over the end result, they will be specifying how I do it and what the end result looks like. The have control of the accuracy of how the final image looks.
When you look at it that way, it is "direction" that should lead to infallibility, not "inspiration!"