In mainstream Christianty and JW theology the attempted murder of Jesus as a child and the ultimate death of Jesus has always been attributed to the outworkings of Satan. However Satan had no motive and nothing to gain from orchestrating the events that led to the death of Jesus.
Consider (based on objective JW theology) the following arguments:
Satan had everything to gain by protecting Jesus both in infancy and in adulthood.
- If Satan protected Jesus then their would be no ransom sacrifice, no resurrection, no new system, no armageddon.
- Further the prophecies of Jesus would have turned out to be false.
- God would have been revealed to have been a liar.
- Satan would still be the ruler of the world and he would not have been cast down.
- God's kingdom would have been brought to nought.
- There would be no fulfillment of the holy writings in the old testament.
- The would be no new testament.
- The so-called universal issue would have been won in favor of Satan himself.
Jesus would still be alive today unless he died of an accident. The bible actually contains no evidence that Satan played a part in the death of Jesus. There is no charge, no trial, no impartial verdict. JWs claim Jesus was subjected to an unfair and unlawful trial. However Satan was judged and condemned with no trial.
In the garden of Eden Satan was judged guilty of killing Jesus, an event of which had not happened. Satan was judged and sentenced to death before he had committed the alleged murder. Besides this the actual alleged murder victim was with both god and Satan and the other angels in heaven. He could have spoken up and testified that he had not been murdered or killed.
To prove god a liar and a false accuser all Satan had to do was protect Jesus life while he was on Earth. This then raises the question "Who actually had motive to kill Jesus and who gained from his death?"