Every year in dozens of cities where conventions are being
held, newspapers typically write an article about the event. There are exceptions,
but usually they print articles like these:
http://www.gazettes.com/entertainment/jehovah-s-witness-annual-convention-promotes-loyalty/article_d00965a6-1d1f-11e6-86b8-ef61aa9f3fae.html
http://www.presstelegram.com/social-affairs/20160519/thousands-of-jehovahs-witnesses-will-kick-off-weekend-conventions-in-long-beach
Typically, the journalist goes to the convention spokesman
who gives the official spiel: “Loyalty is a big factor in our lives…And we teach how to display that.…One of the big focuses is how to positively impact the household and family…It’s a pretty positive experience.”
Loyalty, family life, positivity! How nice!
Of course, we
know the alarming things that are really being taught at the convention. Rather
than a positive experience, it is guilt inducing, apocalyptic and divisive to family
life.
I would love to see more newspaper articles that did some actual objective reporting, rather than puff pieces.
Why do journalists write these puff pieces? Why do they tend
not do a little digging and do a more objective article? What’s in it for them?
One of the articles above highlighted how the conventions
would bring into the city $64.5 million dollars. Does the money effect how the newspapers
report on the conventions?
I’ve no answers here. I’m just asking. And what can be done to remedy this?