thinking vs. feeling.. must we choose just one ?
I really like this title. Dr. Gene Scott mentioned in one of his lectures that 'Aristotelian logic doesn't handle paradoxes very well'.
The simple, geometry class type reasoning driven logic that we are so used to is this Aristotelian if a, then b type of thoughts.
It is this type of 'Mr. Spock' logic that is emulated and sought by many. Even WTS tries to use it, although they fill their variety with logical fallacies. (My favorite WTS logical fallacy is what I call 'proof by analogy'.)
These logical processes exclude contradictory statements and try to resolve things by selecting one argument over another.
What if BOTH seemingly mutually exclusive arguments could still be held?
Mustang