my wife and i have been together for 12 years.
married for 6. she was born into the truth, i studied for 2 years before we got married.
we would attend meetings on a weekly basis, go to conventions, and memorial every year.
It was a wealthy worldly person coming onto my wife and she was engaging.
Hypergamy.
Do you just "file for divorce the next day", as if you might wake up and get a coffee? Sounds like she had a plan. She has been cultivating this monkey branch for some time.
https://youtu.be/ty_2l8zynvq.
Pfft. It was going really well there, and Rick had some nice words about Minimus.
Soooo, min was your henchman, eh Simon? .... Good lord
minimus former jw, prolific poster on jwn died.. minimus.
joined 19 years ago.
started 4,139 topics.
He has been silent for almost a month. But I agree, not sure I trust six screens.
If true, it sucks.
so picture this, you are suddenly withdrawing troops after 2 decades in a country and, well, its all gone to shit.. how do you ensure that your vulnerable citizens and allies can get out when the airport is surrounded and no one can get through?.
option 1: it's a trick question surely?
you don't get yourself into this mess in the first place - you withdraw the citizens first, not last, duh!.
But it turned out to be a house with women and kids in and they blew a half-dozen toddlers to kingdom come, the youngest being a 2 year old girl, all so Biden could try to save face on TV and look like he's "doing something" and "in command".
Simon, come on! That was four or five days ago.
so picture this, you are suddenly withdrawing troops after 2 decades in a country and, well, its all gone to shit.. how do you ensure that your vulnerable citizens and allies can get out when the airport is surrounded and no one can get through?.
option 1: it's a trick question surely?
you don't get yourself into this mess in the first place - you withdraw the citizens first, not last, duh!.
In an ideal world no, I would have preferred Afghanistan in a stable, democratic state before the US/NATO coalition did that.
Stable Afghanistan is not possible, as the average IQ of the nation is 85.
most of us know what theocratic warfare means but maybe very few people reading this forum might never heard of theocratic warfare.
can you give them some examples of theocratic warfare?
.
Theocratic Warfare: It's the abandoning of all Christian principles with the goal of saving "true" Chritianity.
sometime within the last 2 weeks, someone took a sledgehammer to the pyramid monument in allegheny.
they stole the topstone, smashed the cross and crown emblem and removed the seal.. personally i'm surprised it lasted this long untouched.
although through the years russell's grave has been vandalized, it was always repaired by the bible students..
great news.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58309254.
pfizer's two-dose covid-19 vaccine has received full approval from the us food and drug administration (fda) - the first jab to be licensed in the nation.. .
the vaccine had initially been given emergency use authorisation.
Uhm, because the vaccine reduces your chance of getting Covid and reduces you symptoms, especially death or serious illness. Pretty simple.
Risk is rarely a one-size-fits-all calculation, and is often multifaceted.
great news.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58309254.
pfizer's two-dose covid-19 vaccine has received full approval from the us food and drug administration (fda) - the first jab to be licensed in the nation.. .
the vaccine had initially been given emergency use authorisation.
The vaccine is what it is. There was no way to know how good it could be before it was used. It is certainly better than not taking it.
What, then, is the reason behind the FDA approval process, normally spanning two to three years, not counting the trials? Look at the Pfizer FDA approval - read the entire letter. There is a list of recommended trials and tests that normally would have to be completed but were bypassed in this case.
You don't need to release it to test the effects, just like you don't need to pass a bill to find out what's in it.
5:27; 9:59; 18:22; jn.
9:48; [21:8]; 24:47; jn.
21:12, 17;] jn.
I never understood the "read-this-scripture-to-them-and-it-will-set-them-straight" argument. Or the "if-Jesus-isnt-God-then-how-do-explain-what-he-said-here" argument. There is a rationalization for every scripture. There is an explanation for every objection.
They just disagree with you, in much the same way one might disagree about the meaning of a passage in Moby Dick.
