Today I described to a relative, one who has never been a JW but knows my family well, how shunning works. His jaw pretty much dropped to the ground.
On topic..........
On the other hand, if the circumstancesraise serious questions and the appointed person
has lost the respect of the congregation, the elders may determine that it would be best for the
appointed person to relinquish his privilege of service. '
What does "raise serious questions" mean? Raise which serious questions in the mind of who exactly? How serious do the questions have to be? Will the person in whose mind these "serious questions" have been raised also be subjected to a personal evaluation of whether they are qualified to cast the first stone?
Cult speak. Sufficiently obscure and vague and loaded with unspoken rules.
On the other hand, if the circumstances raise serious questions and the appointed person
has lost the respect of the congregation, the elders may determine that it would be best for the
appointed person to relinquish his privilege of service.
Let me understand this right. A congregation is usually between 60 and 180 people. What does "lost respect" mean? Does the MS/elder/pioneer, despite their work for the organization have to have "lost respect" by the entire congregation, like 100%, or is 80% okay? Or 20% of sisters gossiping plus 100% of elders? Or 10% of sisters if they are elders' wives plus 10% of publishers??
Cult speak. Hmm, "you know exactly what we mean, body of elders.......... Rumors reflect badly on the congrega... we mean on the Governin... we mean Jehovah, yes, Jehovah the almighty God. A rumor that a brother is looking after his family member will reflect badly on Jehovah our God of love. Although it may pain you, you know it's what you need to do."
On the other hand, if the circumstances raise serious questions and the appointed person
has lost the respect of the congregation, the elders may determine that it would be best for the
appointed person to relinquish his privilege of service.
Oh they may randomly decide on the basis of their own feelings determine that it would be best? What percentage of the congreagation should have lost respect for the person again?
Cult.
On the other hand, if the circumstances raise serious questions and the appointed person
has lost the respect of the congregation, the elders may determine that it would be best for the
appointed person to relinquish his privilege of service.
Don't you mean have the voluntary unpaid work taken away from them? Or did you really mean "to relinquish"?
Cult.
On the other hand, if the circumstances raise serious questions and the appointed person
has lost the respect of the congregation, the elders may determine that it would be best for the
appointed person to relinquish his privilege of service.
Don't even get me started on this one.
Cult.