Yea, far be it from us to dictate to you what you do, but let us heavily imply just that. Dictate........Imply with underlining threats....dictate.....whats the difference.
Just a bunch o shit, different day.
Also, I'd like to add that I've not read anything recent, for the exact reason that it fired me up, but I read this article (the scan, here) and it really was so very clear. I can already tell I will have a difficult time expressing what I wish to convey, so bear with me.
The tone in which they write is condescending, but also on a surface level we know its a writer who is making this article, but it's subliminally written as if it's the GB speaking directly to us. There are comments which imply that we DO know something and DO agree with something, and that's the way it should be. And if we DON'T agree with it? Then the feeling is there that you aren't worthy, or subpar, or beneath acceptable to be in line with Jehovahs standards. Example: Little Johnny, you KNOW that your father and I like for you to keep your room clean, and you are a happy boy when it's clean and your parents are pleased with you. So you know what to do, and what will happen if you don't straighten up"
We've got the parents telling the kid he already clearly has this concept (and if he doesn't he's just stupid)....then there is the threat of what happens if he doesn't step in line (the you know what will happen if you don't straighten up)....also the subtle mentioning of others emotions being controlled by Little Johnny. It's manipulative, it's condescending, it's controlling, and it's pious. I can't stand any of it.
I'm shutting up now.