garyneal wrote: "In the end, though, it would still make more sense for me to believe rather than not believe. I guess, in the end, I find myself quoting another poster who said this, 'It is better for me to have questions I cannot answer, rather than answers I cannot question.'"
That's a pretty good philosophy with regard to this matter. There are passages of the Bible I still cannot figure out and one that nags at me because it has the appearance of a prophecy that failed. Yet, I am constantly reminded that just because I cannot understand something does not mean it is wrong, it just means I cannot understand it. If every mysterious thing was immediately assumed to be error, then study, exploration, and inquiry would be squashed.
Over all, I look at the evidences of the majority of prophecies in Scripture (e.g. Isaiah and Daniel) and am utterly convinced that God has revealed Himself and the future to certain persons. It is kind of funny. The world says, "Show me just one valid supernatural event and I will gladly believe in spirits, demons, and magic, however, for me to believe in the God of the Bible you must first prove to me that every comment and event in the Bible is true." When it comes to belief in the true God the world changes their standard of evidence and proof.