Then you and I are not ready to have a reasonable debate. I've barely skimmed the surface of logic studies, but the ten pages I got through convinced me that the very foundation of logic is that in a well structured argument there can only be one right answer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic
Who cares if someone deems it illogical? Opinions are cheap. Truths are hard-won. Opinion-holders have to prove it! This style of reason, by the way, does not suit television very well. It's much cheaper and faster to install a microphone on the street and gather a dozen opinions. But do those opinions mean anything?
OK, I think you have made some wrong assumptions. When I speak about ''opinions'', I was not refering to the random surveys taken by television interviewers on the street. Those opinions hold no weight, they have no power, they are meaningless. They are for entertainment purposes only. I was thinking of GOVERNMENT'S opinions, POLITICIAN'S opinions. People who have power and wealth at their arsenal, who can enforce change.
Assuming I am not wanting a ''reasonable'' debate is, IMHO,a low blow, and an incorrect assumption.
#1. I am not disagreeing with you.
#2. I was merely stating that others may disagree with you.
#3.I agree with the foundation of Logic.
I was merely stating that other people are not logical, but may wholeheartedly believe that they hold a position of logic.
One person who comes to mind is George W Bush, a person with almost absolute power, and who believs His opinions and viewpoints are logical, correct and true.
Why do you have to debate with me?
I have read and respected your view points.
If disagreeing with you means that you feel that we can't debate, then does that mean you only debate with people who agree with you?
I am thinking that you will probably reply, ''No, of course not!''.
So then why did you make these comments, and why did you feel the need to instruct me as though I am ignorant about logic? Just letting you know that your comments do come across as condescension. If you did not mean to be condescending, then I will take your word for it.
e - I respectfully disagree, I have seen where someone can present a perfectly logical fact, and someone else will deem it illogical...I am just stating what I observe.
jgnat - Then you and I are not ready to have a reasonable debate. I see you haven't been exposed to the style, so I will agree to go fry bigger fish.
I am not a debater, never wanted to be, I never enjoyed it. I would NOT make a good politician. You seem to be very knowledgable about the world of politics, whereas I have no first hand knowlege.
I prefer a mutually respectful exchange of ideas.
I understand that the world does NOT work this way, I am only stating my preference, which is neither right nor wrong, it just is my viewpoint, and the last time I checked, I am allowed to have one, aren't I?
respectfully, -eclipse