Telemetry11
Clearly there are no assumed mechanisms in my argument.
Clearly there are assumed mechanism(s) in your argument. You quote a probability. That probability is based on the creation of a protein and given that the protein is assembled in some way, shape or form, a mechanism must be involved, even if it is randomness.
Anyone can Google and cut and paste without understanding. Obviously you are one such person.
If your stats are correct, then life cannot have evolved.
If life didn't evolve, then, the sky wizard did it.
It is obvious that the sky wizard doesn't exist.
Therefore, the stats quoted by you are incorrect and a mechanism exists where the stas are totally different and allow for the evolution of life within the known time frames.