Couldn't believe this thread (its appearance was so timely) - but I had this very discussion today at lunch with ex-scientology friend.
We were talking about the freemason history channel show last week. I said something or other about elements which "might be considered to be occult" - and got kind of chastized because he thought I had used the word "cult". Part of his exit mechanism was to hang onto many scientology beliefs while leaving because he thinks they all went to hell after L.RonHubbard passed away. He doesn't believe any group is cult-like. Different in the extreme, maybe, but they should not be called such a nasty name. He thinks this is a mainstream derisive term to put down others who look a little "different". They are all perfectly legitimate "religions". ( A little self-defensive, IMHO, by the way.)
But facts are facts...when you have a series of charismatic leaders who isolate people into strange behavior patterns (to their possible harm), and claim to have special knowledge of the universe, powers of God, etc...well, this is a cult being run by cult leaders. That's why we have this word in English - to be able to describe this kind of organization and behavior system.
So, I guess that what some would like to call "suicide freedom fighters" I am still calling "terrorists" and "murderous madmen".
James