Folks,
I have a target in mind which will serve well for this test. It is something quite un-ambiguous, and any incorrect descriptions would be easy to separate from correct ones.
Please tell me what to do - should I take a picture of this "target" and keep it here, display a picture of the target somewhere, simply "think" about it, or provide lat/long for where it is?
Ralph & Glenn, thank you for the detailed information and for participating in this discussion. I must say that this is much different than I though it was, and it seems even more difficult to set up a test based on the descriptions I read in the training manual.
I would be less than honest if I said that I believed this to be possible at all, but I will also say that I would be delighted to be proven wrong. I hope that we can do this simple test to at least establish if there is something there to follow up on. Weather or not the government investigated this means little to me, and I am sure that no matter what their experiences were, there will also be "true beleivers" who will champion its cause. Remember, not that long ago, we had a First Lady who used the services of an astrologer to help her schedule her husband's events. I am sure she beleived that it was helpful, and if asked, could provide plenty of anticecdotal evidence of it having helped.
I also agree with Derek in that someone (not even the person who was supposed to be doing the test) tossing out "car" intermixed with several incorrect pieces of information is hardly convincing at all. If we had 1,000 people doing this, someone would have probably said "Volkswagen." Would we then consider that accurate, and ignore the 999 incorrect submissions?