What I did say that men are reticient to marry because women these days will leave them on trivialities and they have much more to lose legally.
This smacks at best of a sweeping over generalisation but far worse, a rather jaundiced view of women. For the record men have always had the upper hand societally and women far more disadvantaged upon the breakup of a relationship. They predominantly carry the responsibility of child care without the male partner/husbands input and also carry the sole financial responsibility too.
Also, since a great many women are giving it up faster than a goat in heat, this is a disincentive as well.
This supports the point that you appear to have a rather jaundiced view of women and have somehow allowed yourself to objectify them somewhat. What you fail to mark is the fact that men since the dawn of existence have been able to sow their wild oats and to some extent it has been accepted that this is just what men do. It is true that women are today more sexually liberated and thats no bad thing - its not to say that promiscuity should be condoned but there should be a sense of equality in the bed as there is elsewhere.
Secondly, you seem to imply by your comment that because women 'are giving it up faster than a goat on heat' it is a disincentive for men to get married. You seem to imply that men have most of if not all the options when it comes to marriage choices. In might have skipped your notice but fewer women are choosing not to marry also - have you addressed why this might be?
Perhaps you should consider the fact that society overall is choosing other alternatives for reasons no doubt linked to the fact that marriage these days has very little to do with relationships and love.
Why buy the cow when you get the milk for free?
Again just another example of your rather jaundiced view of women and sex in general.
Gary