I would hope that whenever possible, all possible preparations are diligently carried out for all patients who anticipate surgery so that blood isn't necessary. When it is given as a bandaid for unskilled surgery, then you will have more issues.
'Bloodless surgery' is not as simple as just going in for surgery and not receiving blood. The process of undergoing 'bloodless' surgery involves different equipment and different procedures than 'ordinary' surgery. In a 'normal' surgical procedure, your blood isn't drained out of you first, your blood isn't taken outside of your body , washed, and then transfused back into you. In normal surgery, you get to keep your blood inside your body while it is happening - in bloodless procedures, you don't. One of the goals of bloodless medicine is to keep the patient alive as long as possible without blood in their bodies.
About Shannon Farmer et al...
Farmer has never declared a conflict of interest during his involvement in blood management programs. Neither did Axel Hoffman or the many other JWs involved in bloodless management programs.
http://traq.blogspot.ca/2014_06_01_archive.html
Australia's National Blood Authority (NBA), a well respected government organization that does much valuable work, appointed Shannon Farmer, a Jehovah's Witness, as the key consumer representative on a government panel developing new transfusion guidelines for Australia's hospitals. Nil inappropriate about that except Mr. Farmer didn't declare
- Formally, or otherwise it seems, that he was a Jehovah's Witness.
- His consultancy work since 2007 to an Austrian business involved in commercial tendering for patient blood management projects around the world.
When informed, the NBA said it would review the details. Whether or not possible conflicting interests are of "sufficient conflict" is a moot point.
- Receiving fees for consulting and lecturing from multinational pharmaceutical companies,e.g., J and J.
Fact is they were not declared and at the time of his appointment Farmer was described as "consumer" and "independent consumer advocate". An NBA spokesperson is quoted as saying, "The NBA believes any potential conflict of interest, real or perceived, should be declared."
- He's an Adjunct Research Fellow, School of Surgery, at the University of Western Australia, where he's listed as an author on multi-authored papers about blood.
- LinkedIn shows he's an Adjunct Senior Research Fellow Centre for Population Health Research, Curtin University.
- He's apparently an expert on transfusion medicine.
And none of the above profiles even hint that he's consulted for years to Austria's 'Medicine and Economics' business involved in commercial patient blood management projects globally.
How can you not know that someone you appoint to panels developing national blood transfusion guidelines is a member of a religion that forbids transfusion and earns big bucks implementing blood management programs internationally? How can you say, when information comes to light, 'These aren't sufficient conflicts'?
Isn't this equivalent to someone being appointed to a government panel on the future of private laboratories in Alberta (Canada, UK, you name it)
- Who is a member of a political party whose policies are pro-private medicine (pro-private everything)?
So far as I can tell Shannon Farmer is not a physician nor a PhD researcher, yet:
- Who consults for (perhaps partially owns) a private laboratory consortium bidding for government contracts?
Yet it's hard to discover which degrees he has, where he went to school, or any of the normal qualifications of someone who's an author, lecturer, and expert on TM, with university appointments.
Not only is Australia's blood management program spearheaded by prominent JWs, almost all of those involved in bloodless surgery clinics in USA are JWs.
Submitting to 'bloodless' surgical procedures is sort of like going to an abortion clinic run by the pope and managed by prominent Catholics.