Frannie,
Within the last 30 years an instrument called an Eidophone was discovered.
Discovered? Surely you mean "invented"?
It consists of a tightly stretched drum surface, covered evenly with a very moldable, pastelike substance.
What is this substance? Or will any "moldable, pastelike substance" do?
It's been repeatedly observed and carefully recorded that plants will grow faster, healthier and taller when the "music of the masters" is played near them continually, symphonies and the like. When loud and discordant rock music is played near them continually, the plants are sickly, grow very slowly and their growth is stunted, the full height two to four inches shorter than the plants that were lullabyed by the harmonious cords of symphonic music.
Can you provide sources for this claim please?
There's a reason for this little known phenomenon of nature. The singing of the birds sets up a particular sound vibration that promotes the growth of young leaves of trees, plants and flowers, so the birdsong is fairly constant all day long in the spring while the new growth is occurring.
That seems unlikely, from what I know of biology. Can you provide sources for this claim as well please?
The times of the changeover are heralded by the birds; are actually stimulated by the birdsong, but the sterile rules of biology recognize only the synchronicity of it, typically ignoring the clear evidence of cause and effect, unable to explain any other reason for nature's precise timing of the seasonal and daily fluctuations of birdsong. In winter months, of course, birds fly south to where other greenery needs the growth signals of the sound of their singing.
This is patently absurd. These phenomena are all easily explained by real science. Please provide strong supporting evidence for your extraordinary claims.
Considering that the experiment with the Eidophone could be viably translated into our daily lives, why not begin on a certain day and time to eschew everything negative from our speech and tone of voice and written words and attempt to vocalize and write only positive thoughts and ideas.....and see if and how it affects our own personal environment, whether positively or perhaps, not at all?
What would count as a hit, and what as a miss? How could the effects be distinguished from those of simply being nice to people?
I've wanted to try this for myself, but was hesitant because I'd rather have input from others for comparison, so any results couldn't be considered just my imagination or my own thinking that affected the outcome.
Well, at least that's the beginning of the scientific method. You obviously need to define your terms and have clear rules about what would count as a positive or negative result.
If you're correct, Frannie, this discovery would have massive and lasting impacts in the areas of physics and biology. Almost everything we know about the universe would have to be rewritten. I'm wondering why, if this instrument has been around for thirty years, it hasn't already done so.
