Evolution OR Creation?

by Brummie 183 Replies latest members adult

  • AlanF
    AlanF

    frankiespeakin, you've completely ignored the point that Abaddon raised.

    The point is that if God gave mankind a sense of fairness and justice, and then told mankind to go off and make of the world what he will and eventually be judged, but then throws a monkey wrench into mankind's efforts, then if mankind uses that God-given sense of justice to judge that God was unfair, then God was unfair. Period. You can't get around this by saying that God can do whatever he wants -- as if he's beyond judgment. Whatever God does, mankind can judge him on consistency and fairness -- because the Bible says that God built mankind with that ability.

    Your skirting the point is a good example of why so many have given up on Christianity.

    You want to have faith? Then just do it. But if you want to justify your faith by appeal to logic and reason and facts, be prepared to defend your claims.

    AlanF

  • AlanF
    AlanF

    frankiespeakin said:

    : While God did not use exact scientific language common of our 20th-century in the wording of the contract to the Israelites 3200 years ago, He spoke truth to them,

    No, he did not. Genesis contains a number of grossly wrong statements about things like the order of creation, it wrongly gives the impression that God destroyed the entire world in the Flood, and so forth. Wrong is wrong is wrong. If God caused these wrong things to be put in Genesis, then he deceived his readers. Period.

    : He is the Creator they are the creation the contract was no deception, the contract was honest in the truly pertainent, and important things that need to be stated in order to enter into a, eyes opened contract, with God.

    With the basics wrong, the contract is null and void by all standards of decency except one: that of Christians who engage in special pleading.

    : They were merely stated clearly in concepts they could understand or grasp.

    No, they were wrong. Even you really do understand that, which is proved by the fact that you indulge in all manner of special pleading.

    AlanF

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    Alan,

    frankiespeakin
    , to go off and make of the world what he will and eventually be judged, but then throws a monkey wrench into mankind's efforts, then if mankind uses that God-given sense of justice to judge that God was unfair, then God was unfair. you've completely ignored the point that Abaddon raised. The point is that if God gave mankind a sense of fairness and justice, and then told mankindPeriod.

    Alan, I think you're looking at this in a very narrow way that doesn't take into account to other factors. While it's true that God gave man a "sense" of fairness, and justice. Does that mean that every man is "fair and just" just because they can "sense" it? And that God should just let everybody do what they want because they have this "sense" of fairness and justice?

    God also gave mankind "free will" which means he can choose to do good or he can choose to do bad. I think it's perfectly all right, that along with the gift of "free will" comes "responsibility". Actually I'm glad that "responsibility" comes with "free will", even though that may mean some hardships for me personally, when I don't use my "free will", "responsibly". Humans with their God-given "sense" of justice have made laws, I don't always like the laws, but I know there has to be some law and order for our benefit, society's oderliness and structure is based on it, so we've received many benefits from this God given "sense" of fairness and justice, and so I praise God for it.

    I really don't think you or I are in a position in which we could it judge God as unfair. For example, do you know what "ultimate reality" is Alan? I'm sure you know what the anthropic principle is, could you design a universe that manifests anthropic principle like ours? Gods intelligence and justice is far greater than anything we humans have, we have a measure of a wisdom, that is very small comparison to that of the Creator.

    I don't think it's reasonable to expect that the Creator should give us wisdom and self-sufficiency so that we could live in this universe and just forget about Him or we could just do our own thing and not be bothered by any type of responsibility towards the One who made everything possible. To expect such a thing is, the highest form of ungratefulness and is an insult to the Creator who gave us the gift of life. To my "sense" of "justice and fairness" I see it as totally right to give him the worship that he deserves.

    You can't get around this by saying that God can do whatever he wants -- as if he's beyond judgment. Whatever God does, mankind can judge him on consistency and fairness -- because the Bible says that God built mankind with that ability.

    Well I guess if you could somehow demote God to equal status with man, you can judge Him. But to use our "sense of fairness" we must remember God is not our equal, or should I put it more clearly we are not God's equal,.. We're not God's peers. To be "fair", we have to admit that we do not have all the facts to render a righteous decision about how "fair" God is. There are a number of ways that we to look at matter and render different opinions. I myself feel totally unqualified to render a judicial decision about how the Creator has handled things, for one thing there's too much I cannot, and do not know and so I put my hand over my mouth and avoid any type of judgments, that are negative.

    Your skirting the point is a good example of why so many have given up on Christianity. You want to have faith? Then just do it. But if you want to justify your faith by appeal to logic and reason and facts, be prepared to defend your claims. AlanF

    I don't think that I'm skirting the point, I'm perhaps doing a fair job at defending my beleifs, according to what my beleifs actually are, and I think they're logical, they're logical to me anyway , they may not be logical to you because you have a certainly way of looking at things that are not my way of looking at things.

  • AlanF
    AlanF

    You're still skirting the point, frankiespeakin. I guess I'll have to simplify it to where you can understand it and be hard put not to get the point.

    Suppose that I as a father told my five year old daughter, "See that cookie jar on top of the refrigerator? If you can get to it, you can eat all the cookies." I don't expect that she'll be able to figure out how to do it, and I really don't want her to eat the cookies, but she's been pestering me and I'm tired of it. Turns out she's a lot more resourceful than I gave her credit for. She immediately starts trying to figure a way to get the cookies. She's much too short to reach, and jumping doesn't work. So she puts a chair in the right spot, and then puts a big cardboard box on the chair, and climbs up. She's just about to touch the cookie jar when I walk in the room and see it. So I kick the chair out from under her and she falls flat on the floor.

    Now, frankiespeakin, was I fair? Please explain why or why not. Then relate this to my point about God's throwing a monkey wrench into human affairs. If you can't explain these things, say so and I'll do it for you.

    AlanF

  • frenchbabyface
    frenchbabyface



    To Frankies : Well I understand that you want us to believe you BUT ON WHAT ?
    Christian's want us to believe in the bible BUT ON WHAT ?

    I mean it is fair to ask the truth ... when the book says it is the truth don't you think
    I have been sarcastic at first to push you a bit to get some facts, cause I'm interested you know ?
    But you are not even realistic, you don't even acquies the facts,
    it doesn't help to believe in you ... AT ALL

    I'm not going to talk for others so this is what I have to say :

    Somehow I've found Alan and Abbandon and the others very patient with you I couldn't stand it myself

    If you feel good believing in what you believe ... good
    but I can't read again and again the same thing that just lead me to "NOWHERE"
    Trusting for trusting doesn't mean anything to me

    And you know what MOREOVER to me the problem is that
    THERE IS NO LOVE IN THIS BOOK SO EVEN IT IF WAS THE BOOK OF GOD
    I just can't love this GOD.

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    Frenchie:

    THERE IS NO LOVE IN THIS BOOK SO EVEN IT IF WAS THE BOOK OF GOD I just can't love this GOD.

    Sorry, mon ami, I have to disagree with part of this comment.
    I agree that there are whole swathes of the canon that dont portray much love, but as for the whole thing? That's a generalization.

    I suspect the main reason that many Christian churches concentrate on the New Testament is because it more clearly portrays the ethos of what Christianity is supposed to be about.
    The gospel of John being a good example of this, IMHO.

    Just so I don't get in trouble for posting off-topic comments:
    "What a loving creator - Yayy!!"

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    I will respond latter this afternoon, if I get a chance, or over the weekend.

    I would like to share this link it has 62 of the first pages of a well written book on Genesis, I think some here may perhaps find it very good the author is not Christian, but Jewish.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0805202536/ref=lib_rd_ss_TR05/102-4956814-7756939?v=glance&s=books&vi=reader&img=6#reader-link

  • frenchbabyface
    frenchbabyface


    To Little Toe : Good for you ... if it can help somewhere
    You are so nice ... you can believe in whatever you want ...
    I guess it is you iner ... nothing to do with God somehow ...
    and you give him the credit ... Well it's nice ... and it doesn't hurt SO

    but still ... to me no proof ... and I can't take a part and forget about what doesn't fit (not logical for this book)

    This book doesn't make me feel secure AT ALL

    And somehow, I want to believe in human beings,
    cause I know we are able to be better than that if only we didn't have religions for much divisions !!!
    If only people wasn't pushed to be bad ... if only ...

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    Frenchie:
    Maybe I'm just not being clear.
    The bible is a compilation of 66 books, by various authors.
    We don't have the names of those who decided what would or wouldn't be in this compilation.
    (I know you know this, I'm just trying to clarify what I'm saying)

    Some of the books that comprise this volume are quite different from others.
    Hence I offer "John" for a different world view from that held by the author of Genesis, even though the opening words are the same...

    Whilst human beings are able to be better, it appears that it's not just religion that causes discord (though I confess it often has a great deal to do with it). Belief in creation or evolution isn't, IMHO, what makes people bad. It's something far more base, that we are trying to rise above.

    Meanwhile - I hope you had a good week

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    Here's a quote fron the intro to the book that is interesting.

    Accordingly we have constantly emphasized in this both the importance of difference and have been at pains to delineate that those areas in which Israel parted company with its neighbors. It's so brilliantly hope we have brought out the essential religious concepts that underlie the Genesis narratives and which are characterisic of the Bible as a whole. On the one hand there can be no doubt whatsoever that the cumulative effects of the parallels is to confirm that Israel share the common cultural patricmony of the ancient near Eastern world. On the other hand is equally incontrovertible that there where indebtedness exist there has been a considerable amount of careful selectivity and adaption. The old mythological motifs were not slavishly borrowed; there's no question here of uncreative imatation. Sometimes in fact these motifs seem to have been deliberately used in order to empty them of their polytheistic content and filled them with totally new meaning, redefined, dynamic and vibrant and other times they had been torn out of their life context to become mere literary devices static and conventionalized.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit