New DNA Study Confirms Noah (page 3)

snowbird

Uh uh.

I'm not lying; I have read many books about evolution.

I've just not bought into the anti-Creation hype.

Once again, where is Mr. Jeanson in error?

Sylvia

sparky1

Genetics again confirms Genesis.

By God, I think you're on to something. The story of Lot and his daughters proves that they were interested in passing on genetic purity all to the 'praise' of Jehovah!

sir82

I'm not lying; I have read many books about evolution.

With all due respect, it's hard to believe that if you can't think of even one title.

snowbird

That shows, Sir, what I thought of them.

Sylvia

cofty

Assuming that God placed the ideal mtDNA sequence into Eve, all those differences arose by mutations since the Genesis 3 curse, about 6,000 years ago. Other scientists measured the rate at which these copying errors occur. Though very slow—we acquire about one mutation every 6 generations—a few dozen mutations could appear after several millennia.

Compare that facile waffle with the actual article I linked you to Snowy. See how real scientists present pages of detailed data to describe the numerous factors that affect MtDNA mutation rates.

Also notice the superstitious assumption on which his calculations are based.

I'm not lying; I have read many books about evolution. - Snowy

Yes you are. I didn't ask you if you have read things "about evolution". You know that isn't my question. I asked what books THAT PRESENT THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION you have read.

The answer is of course none.