ILoveTATT2, I follow your reasoning. I just don’t agree with the conclusions you have drawn from your reasoning.
You quote the organization quoting OTHER sources and point the finger at the organisation - rather than the milieu of the time when the quotes were made.
The main point - lost in your forest of rebuttals - is that in not one instance did the organization quote the source in an approving manner of using the word. Now that would have been a catch!
There are so many other valid issues with which to call to account JW organization. In my view, this is definitely not one of them.