What Really Happened (Back Then) With The False Teaching Of 1975 Among Jehovah's Witnesses?

by 1975JWExpert 59 Replies latest jw friends

  • 1975JWExpert
    1975JWExpert

    A Close Comparison Of Two Distinct Paragraphs Written In The Watchtower magazines . . .

    The July 15th, 1976 Watchtower magazine quote:

    "But it is not advisable for us to set our sites on a certain date... If anyone has been disappointed through not following this line of thought he should now concentrate on adjusting his viewpoint, seeing that it was not the word of God that failed or deceived him and brought disappointment, but that his own understanding was based on wrong premises." Watchtower 7/15/1976 p.441

    At first, it looks like the Watchtower writers are placing the real blame upon the brothers in general, for the false expectations, and disappointments from the false teaching of 1975.

    But actually, they are not.

    The first quote was written while the then President of the Watchtower Society Nathan Homer Knorr and His Vice-President Frederick W. Franz were still alive. The above statement was originally written to primarily humiliate them both, while occupying their offices of oversight, since it was believed (and generally known) they were mainly responsible for pushing the date of 1975, as an insinuated, Armageddon date in the JW literature. They taught it was more of a "probability" than a mere "possibility," which proved to be very, very wrong.

    In other words, "2 schools of thought" at Bethel Headquarters on the date of 1975.

    It seems, this bold statement was made by eager members of the newly empowered Governing Body, who could actually make such bold admissions, since they had duly received power and authority over Watchtower publications, ever since January 1st, 1976. So, the Watchtower magazine was used to chastise these men.

    Now, let us notice the following quote, which tells more about the critical situation.

    The March 15th, 1980 Watchtower magazine quote:

    "With the appearance of the book Life Everlasting in Freedom of the Sons of God, and its comments as to how appropriate it would be for the millennial reign of Christ to parallel the seventh millennium of mans existence, considerable expectation was aroused regarding the year 1975. Unfortunately, however, along with such cautionary information, There were other statements published that implied that such realisation of hopes by that year was more of a probability than a mere possibility. There were statements made then, and thereafter, stressing that this was only a possibility. It is to be regretted that these latter statements apparently overshadowed the cautionary ones and contributed to a build-up of the expectation already initiated....In saying anyone, the Watchtower included all disappointed ones of Jehovah's Witnesses, hence including persons having to do with the publication of the information that contributed to the build-up of hopes centered on that date. (Watchtower, March 15, 1980, p. 17-18)

    (For more information on this topic, please see this link:
    http://jehovahstruth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=107



    ***

  • Chevelle
  • DisgruntledFool
    DisgruntledFool

    Interesting conjecture, 1975JWExpert. Do you have any evidence for this or conversations with people in the know? Ray Franz never mentioned anything about this in his books. I was a Bethelite during this time period 1974-1976 and never heard this. There were lots of 'reliable rumors' talked about but I never heard anything even close to this assertion.

  • Gorb
    Gorb

    It Separated the Wheat from the Chaff”

    The “1975” Prophecy and Its Impact among Dutch Jehovah's Witnesses
  • DesirousOfChange
    DesirousOfChange
    There were other statements published that implied that such realisation of hopes by that year was more of a probability than a mere possibility.

    Were these not "from God". WT is God's "mouthpiece", right?

  • Littleleslie
    Littleleslie

    Hi 1975JWExpert


    That explanation of what happened is very clear and understandable, easy to read.

    The thing I was thinking was, how did they come to have two schools of thought if it is Jehovah that is leading them. It shows right there that they don't have any "spirit direction" from Jehovah.

    Littleleslie
  • Touchofgrey
    Touchofgrey

    1975JWexpert

    Sounds like your gaslighting individuals who were believing jws leading upto 1975 and them expecting armageddon and life into the new world.

    Just as the governing body did in blaming the believing jws for their expectations and selling their homes etc so that they could pioneer because the end was imminent.

    Manipulate them into doubting their own perceptions, experiences or understanding of events.

    That's a form of emotional abuse.

  • Halcon
    Halcon
    Disgruntledfool- I was a Bethelite during this time period 1974-1976 and never heard this.

    Was bethel caught up in the furor as it's described happened on the outside?

  • Rivergang
    Rivergang

    Touchofgrey,

    I would have thought any “gaslighting” which was carried out was by the writers of that 1976 Watchtower article.

    (What they in effect said was “anybody who believed it was a bloody fool - but not us, though - we were too clever for that!)

  • DisgruntledFool
    DisgruntledFool

    Halcon, to answer your question, some were and some were not. We didn't get 'fire and brimstone' talks at morning worship. I recall more interest in the organizational changes being implemented in the congregations as well as in Bethel being far more a topic of discussion.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit