That article does make more sense than other ideas.
Where Do You Think That Plane Is?
by minimus 175 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
Jeannette
Diego Garcia
20 technology nerds - Chinese engineers along with hardware and software, and interrogation.
Summit next week at the Hague with 58 world leaders. Implant plane.
One World Government emerging from the ashes? Just guessing.
-
Jeannette
Also, the pilot had Diego Garcia progammed into his flight simulator at home.
-
metatron
This thing is turning into a bad movie script with too many sequels.
Over at BusinessInsider, some pilots are disagreeing with the 'best answer/fire' theory. They feel strongly that if that happened, the pilots would be on the horn screaming Mayday.
The story seems to be moving towards Diego Garcia - and that brings up a whole lot of hard questions.
metatron
-
transhuman68
LOL, Diego Garcia is just one of many airports in Microsoft Flight Simulator- it doesn't necessarily mean anything. If the airliner had gone there, the U.S. would have to admit it. And what metatron said: the pilots should have been able to send out a distress signal. Nothing about this makes any sense.
-
prologos
Diego Garcia airport, yeah, the way the 9/11 pilots were looking for kennedy, La guardia and Newark and could not find it, so next alternative was the twin towers and
In Arlington VA they missed national airport by 10 miles and hit the Pentagon.
-
transhuman68
LOL prologos! Not to land on it, but to crash into it- 9/11 style. It's an important U.S. millitary base- a good target for terrorists. Maybe the airliner was hijacked, and the hijacker wanted the pilot to crash into something- like the Diego Garcia base- but the pilot crashed into the sea instead...
-
metatron
Southern Indian ocean sounds like Diego Garcia again.
There is a strange story circulating about two Navy Seals loading something on the plane and then suddenly dying of heroin overdoses soon afterward. May be just nonsense but this whole thing has gotten weird.
metatron
-
DJS
NonJWSpouse,
I said I wasn't going to make additional comments because there have been so many inaccurate statements about this. However, in response to your llink this comment from today's news:
"On Tuesday, for example, a law enforcement official told CNN that the aircraft's first major change of course was almost certainly programmed by somebody in the cockpit. The change was entered into the plane's system at least 12 minutes before a person in the cockpit, believed to be the co-pilot, signed off to air traffic controllers."
If this is true, the last sign-off wouldn't have been 'good night.' Of course most of what we have heard is lacking credibility. Another statement indicates the plan flew for 6 hours after the course change; again, it strains credibility to think the plane could fly that long after such a catastrophic issue.
Of course none of this may be accurate. Good link though as it sheds rational light on the matter, which is always a good thing.
-
nonjwspouse
DJS, I have head so many interiews experts and officials that say so many conflicting things that I find most or any of them hard to really believe. it is a circus of media frenzy with opinions like firecracker fallout, going everywhere. I get the problem that the plan is no where to be found, but so have others been lost without a trace. That is not unheard of at all. In the vast ocean it is actually more possible than not.
The timing ofthe autopilot programming, how do they know this when they have not one piece of that plane to inspect? ?