soft + gentle
What good is an apology if they fail to take steps to reverse the harm? There are still people who are finding out they were added to the AAWA facebook page without their consent, who may face personal problems in their relationships as a result. Even if membership of the group is no longer visible on timelines, members who were added without their consent can still identify each other, which could still be creating problems. Quite apart from which, keeping over a thousand members who were added without their consent is dubious ethically, even if there were no potential harm. And yet people have been harmed, and may still be harmed, and they are doing nothing to stop it! What apart from pride and ego prevents AAWA from removing the page. They could start again if they wish, and use the secrecy setting to prevent people being added without their consent. And why are Cedars and the guy with the Mexican hat the only ones with anything to say at all? Don't the rest of the directors of this organisation have any responsibility? The silence is deafening. jwfacts seems like such a sensible chap as well! I am especially disappointed.