Another use of copyright law to suppress those who mock them (and rightly so, too). Yet they can ruin children's lives with the policies that are responsible for this mockery in the first place.
I wish I was the judge on this case. I would drag in every time the Washtowel lifts a picture from a worldly publication and puts it on their rags, and make them pay the original publishers royalties per rag. Not to mention, I would make the Washtowel pay hefty royalties to Vangelis (along with a hefty defamation claim for fxxxing up their hit Chariots of Fire. This is for the Kingdumb Malady 42-1984 edition. They should pay royalty for every copy of their "music(??)" that includes this sxxx, and more for "public performance" each time song 42 came up while that songbook was in force. Then, I would answer to the pedophiles that silenced their victims, the scams used to extort people into being baptized at age 6 or sell out and pious-sneer, or whose families were busted up by the shunning policies.
Not to mention, if the Washtowel is sending out false copyright infringements (threatening to intimidate someone for re-posting something or remove merchandise, where no copyright exists), I would actually counter-sue the Washtowel for that. They are using a threat of legal action based on a copyright they do not hold, and that needs to be addressed. If they do not have a copyright or trademark (and it has to be registered), you have every right to sell merchandise based on that character--and they can be counter-sued or even go to jail for threatening you on a false copyright.
