Well i am making this up too
Yes you are making it up bioflex. You are trying to win this argument by throwing around insults and imputing questionable motives. For the record, humans cannot reproduce with other species. That's what species means on a biological level---the inability to reproduce with members outside your species. There are some exceptions--for instance when sub-species are still so closely related, they may produce offspring--like the Mule. But the offspring are sterile. That's a donkey and a horse. Humans are not that close to any other species.
The reason you will not win your argument, and the reason that preacher will never make anyone listen, are the unsupported insults. "Well if we believe in evolution, what's to stop us from committing bestiality?" "Ooooo look, I never actually read this book, but Darwin is talking about RACES, he's a racist!"
Darwin probably was a racist. It was the norm for the time period he lived in---EVERYONE was racist. He was also an abolitionist, during a time when preachers used scriptures to support slavery.
Eugenics did grow from science, and anthropology accepts the responsiblity for this grave mistake. But guess who leads in the fight against such ideas? Anthropologists. It was an anthropologist that first insisted that taking measurements and breaking people down by race had absolutely no scientific value. The fight continues today. Anthropologists will all tell you that race cannot be defined biologically and is an arbitrary concept that humans judge by appearance.
They came to this conclusion after a relatively short time, while the churches preached this mistake for thousands of years. The scientific process is all about proving ideas wrong, and when they do so, they admit it and set about fixing things. I don't remember the scientist's name, but a professor had worked on a hypothesis for FIFTY years. His entire life. One day an American scientist came in, took a look and proved it wrong. Do you know what the professor's response was? He thanked him. He thanked him for falsifying his life's work. Because now he had his answer and that was the driving force.
Your preacher condemns critical thinking, which means he is not interested in fixing his mistakes. He throws around insults and presents partial truths to support his argument. He never even read Origin of the Species, and yet he is confident that it is trash. He does not even understand the theory of evolution, but he just knows it's not true. You see, he figured it all out before he even got to high school. He figured it out before his education started concentrating on critical thinking. His mind was closed before he even had the skill to properly question his belief.
Don't fall into that trap Bioflex. If creation is true, then try to prove it wrong. That is what a scientist would do, and if it's true there is nothing to fear. But you can't prove it true by disproving evolution. You must prove it is true by trying to prove creation is false. If it stands strong no matter how much you try to prove it is wrong, then it grows stronger. But it never grows safe. It should always be open to question and challenge, and as our knowledge grows and new techniques and understandings are developed, it must stand up to that too. That is what is happening with evolution.
When Darwin put forth his theory we knew nothing about genetics. Today we have cracked genomes. Guess what. Evolution still has not been disproven even with this extraordinary knowledge. It continues to hold and the picture becomes clearer.
NC