Some of you may know, I've been meeting with a JW lady, for a "bible" study (I hate calling it that). I've been trying to end it pretty much since
I've gotten more insight on their religion...I've blantently said that I don't like the "governing body", I don't agree with the blood doctrine, can't
fathom the whole disfellowship thing, that I read everything I can, especially but not limited to, "apostate" view points. So, she's breaking it down to
the whole idea of the "Trinity". She feels that if I can't rationaly explain my belief in the trinity, then that eliminates every other religion, so we
can go from there. (!!!!!!!) I told her about the Heresies of Arius, and that the denial of Christs divinity is not a new concept, she knew nothing about
this, and after she left I read more about how the whole doctrine of the Trinity was developed, and now I'm questioning the whole thing myself..
If I question the whole idea of the trinity, where does that leave me? I feel there must be something that I'm missing, I don't think these jokers
in Brooklyn have it right, there must be a concrete reason why the churches have been teaching this for hundreds of years. And if theres not,
then why should I give them more creditability the the Jws.. Please , can someone help me articulate this better?