Have fun talking into the air, waging your war of words!
Apparently, more than the "air" is responding. I think that this is a viable explanation for the leak. Or it could be a big payoff to an insider (by some "evil" representative of "Big Carbon"). Or it could merely be a whistleblower in the University’s IT department. I’ve worked this field enough to tell know why.
If you can’t cut it in IT, you don’t become a muddling nincompoop shuffled between academic departments. You run screaming and never want to go near a computer ever again. If you actually manage to qualify as an email admin, you have put in your time. It doesn’t matter if you are a left-handed lesbian Eskimo or a one eyed flying purple people eater, or even a conservative. You are, to a certain extent, indispensable, and academic institutions will hire anyone that qualifies.
Entry level IT jobs involve dealing with customers at their worst. It’s is difficult to be intimidated by the formidable intellect of the tenured academic that has to call every morning just to reset the password he can’t seem to remember. Wordsmithery and masturbatory academic honorifics are even less impressive.
Those CRU professors with the real mad climatology skills could have done their own deleting when the Freedom Of Information Act request went through, and we may never have known a thing. But these frauds strike me as lazy, and would have left the deleting to some put upon IT administrator.
We already have clear evidence of collusion among the short list of elites, even a conspiracy to control what gets published in respected peer reviewed journals. This does not even touch on the commented computer code that generated the data that forms a basis for international carbon trade recommendations
Really, is it so hard to believe the possibility unveiled by of the anthropogenic global warming movement furnishing a convenient rationale for the strengthening of a global political entity's power? I ask you seriously.
BTS
