The data is now suspect. Until that is addressed; all the graphs, statements by experts etc, are moot.
Yes, but which data? Pro or con?
by Perry 372 Replies latest members politics
The data is now suspect. Until that is addressed; all the graphs, statements by experts etc, are moot.
Yes, but which data? Pro or con?
I believe since CRU was clearly Pro and produced alot of the data used to create the pretty little graphs thrown out there by the Goracles crowd which is now suspect based on the email leaks, that would be Pro.
You think exposing your sister's lies is stalking? I've got 99 problems but a beks aint one.
You haven't exposed anything other than the fact that you are pathetic.
lame street media spends more time bashing Sarah Palin than giving us REAL news
I personally don't believe global warming is caused by man....I believe it is a natural occurrence
Yes, but which data? Pro or con?
All of it.
JeffT: "The data is now suspect. Until that is addressed; all the graphs, statements by experts etc, are moot"
What about photographs taken as far back as 1850? www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retreat_of_glaciers_since_1850
villabolo
Priest I am not scientist, I have worked in as one in a research food laboratory, long time ago. My degree is in Law. I have a son who is a scientist, and obtained a 1st in Medical Biochemistry, and i do listen to his views and opinions.
My point about the noble Lord Monckton is that his opinions are that of a person with a particular agenda. like Nick Griffin has one too. and as such his opinion needs to be put into that context.
David
Deniers love the East Anglia email thing; it feeds their ideas of global conspiracy.
Don't forget: it is a communist plot to sap our precious bodily fluids.